Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34656086›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2021

Prediction of all-cause mortality in coronary artery disease patients with atrial fibrillation based on machine learning models.

Xinyun Liu, Jicheng Jiang, Lili Wei, Wenlu Xing, Hailong Shang, Guangan Liu, Feng Liu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xinyun LiuSoochow University, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Jicheng JiangBig Data Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Zhengzhou, 451450, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Lili WeiDepartment of Cardiology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450003, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Wenlu XingBig Data Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Zhengzhou, 451450, Henan, People's Republic of China.
Hailong ShangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Suzhou, 215028, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Guangan LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 118 Suzhou Industrial Park Wansheng Street, Suzhou, 215028, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Feng LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 118 Suzhou Industrial Park Wansheng Street, Suzhou, 215028, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. fengldoc@outlook.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning (ML) can include more diverse and more complex variables to construct models. This study aimed to develop models based on ML methods to predict the all-cause mortality in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

methodsA total of 2037 CAD patients with AF were included in this study. Three ML methods were used, including the regularization logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machines. The fivefold cross-validation was used to evaluate model performance. The performance was quantified by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

resultsAfter univariate analysis, 24 variables with statistical differences were included into the models. The AUC of regularization logistic regression model, random forest model, and support vector machines model was 0.732 (95% CI 0.649-0.816), 0.728 (95% CI 0.642-0.813), and 0.712 (95% CI 0.630-0.794), respectively. The regularization logistic regression model presented the highest AUC value (0.732 vs 0.728 vs 0.712), specificity (0.699 vs 0.663 vs 0.668), and accuracy (0.936 vs 0.935 vs 0.935) among the three models. However, no statistical differences were observed in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the three models (all P > 0.05).

conclusionCombining the performance of all aspects of the models, the regularization logistic regression model was recommended to be used in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overAtrial FibrillationCause of DeathCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAll-cause mortalityAtrial fibrillationCoronary artery diseaseMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID34656086
PMCPMC8520292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.