Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34655940›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2021

Piloting a spatial mixed method for understanding neighborhood tobacco use disparities.

Louisa M Holmes, Julia McQuoid, Aekta Shah, Tessa Cruz, Antwi Akom, Pamela M Ling

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Louisa M HolmesDepartments of Geography and Demography, And the Social Science Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, 302 Walker Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. Electronic address: lmholmes@psu.edu.
Julia McQuoidTSET Health Promotion Research Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 655 Research Parkway, OK, 73104, USA.
Aekta ShahStreetwyze, 1330 Broadway Suite 300, Oakland, CA 94612 & USA and Social Innovation and Urban Opportunity Lab, UCSF & San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94132, USA.
Tessa CruzStreetwyze, 1330 Broadway Suite 300, Oakland, CA 94612 & USA and Social Innovation and Urban Opportunity Lab, UCSF & San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94132, USA.
Antwi AkomStreetwyze, 1330 Broadway Suite 300, Oakland, CA 94612 & USA and Social Innovation and Urban Opportunity Lab, UCSF & San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94132, USA.
Pamela M LingCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, 530 Parnassus Avenue, Suite 366 Library, San Francisco, CA, 94143-1390, USA.
San Francisco State University · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001872 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COLLARD, HAROLD R, JACOBY, VANESSA · 2016 to 2025
$112.1M
Social Interventions to address disparities In young adult tobacco useP60MD006902 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BIBBINS-DOMINGO, KIRSTEN · 2012 to 2016
$6.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001872NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD006902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tobacco retail environment is where most advertising dollars are spent. However, most research on the retail environment has not methodologically situated tobacco retailers as part of a larger community, and few studies have incorporated community member perspectives of their own tobacco use in relation to their local environments. The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate a multilevel, multimodal, mixed methods approach for understanding tobacco use in context. We combine quantitative data collected from tobacco retailer audits and geographically-explicit interviews with neighborhood residents to tell a more complete story of tobacco use behavior among adults in San Francisco's Marina district, and the Oakland Coliseum neighborhood in Alameda County, California. We find that while area-level and retail data provide a broad snapshot of two distinct communities with respect to sociodemographic characteristics and tobacco availability, interviews with community residents who use tobacco add important perspectives regarding how tobacco retailers are viewed and how residents interact with their neighborhood landscapes on a daily basis. The method we describe and critique has the potential to be scaled to incorporate a broader set of geographies, or tailored to address a multitude of health-related questions. Our approach further demonstrates the utility of including geolocated participant narratives as a means of understanding where researcher interpretations of urban environments diverge from those of community residents.

Indexed as

CommerceTobacco ProductsAdultHumansMarketingResidence CharacteristicsTobacco UseHealth geographyHealth policyNeighborhoods & healthSubstance useTobacco control

Identifiers

PMID34655940
PMCPMC8671214
OpenAlexW3206880315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.