Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34655887›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2021

Unique challenges and outcomes of young women with breast cancers from a tertiary care cancer centre in India.

Jyoti Bajpai, Pradeep Ventrapati, Shalaka Joshi, Tabassum Wadasadawala, Sushmita Rath, Rima Pathak, Ravindra Nandhana, Samarpita Mohanty, Qurratulain Chougle, Mitchelle Engineer and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Management ofEcancermedicalscience · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Jyoti BajpaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India. Electronic address: dr_jyotibajpai@yahoo.co.in.
Pradeep VentrapatiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Shalaka JoshiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Tabassum WadasadawalaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Sushmita RathDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Rima PathakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Ravindra NandhanaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Samarpita MohantyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Qurratulain ChougleDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Mitchelle EngineerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Nissie AbrahamDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Jaya GhoshDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Nita NairDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Seema GuliaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Palak PopatDepartment of Radiology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Patil ADepartment of Surgical Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Tanuja ShethDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Sangeeta DesaiDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Meenakshi ThakurDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Venkatesh RangrajanDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
Vani ParmarDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
R SarinDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
S GuptaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.
R A BadweDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung (≤40 years) breast cancers (YBC) are uncommon, inadequately represented in trials and have unique concerns and merit studying.

methodsThe YBC treated with a curative intent between 2015 and 2016 at our institute were analysed.

resultsThere were 1228 patients with a median age of 36 (12-40) years; 38 (3.1%) had Stage I, 455 (37.1%) - II, 692 (56.3%) -III, and remaining 43 (3.5%) Stage IV (oligo-metastatic) disease; 927 (75.5%) were node positive; 422 (34.4%) were Triple negatives (TNBC), 331 (27%) were HER-2 positive. There were 549 (48.2%) breast conservations and 591 (51.8%) mastectomies of which 62 (10.4%) underwent breast reconstruction. 1143 women received chemotherapy, 617 (53.9%) received as neoadjuvant and 142 (23.1%) had pathological complete response; 934 (81.9%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. At the median follow-up of 48 (0-131) months, 5-year overall and disease-free survival was 79.6% (76.8-82.5) and 59.1% (55.8-62.6). For stage I, II, III and IV, the 5-year overall-survival was 100%, 86.7% (82.8-90.6), 77.3% (73.4-81.2), 69.7% (52.5-86.9) and disease-free survival was 94% (85.9-100), 65.9% (60.3-71.5), 55% (50.5-59.5), and 29.6% (14-45.2) respectively. On multivariate analysis, TNBC and HER-2+ subgroups had poorer survival (p = 0.0035). 25 patients had BRCA mutations with a 5-year DFS of 65.1% (95% CI:43.6-86.6). Fertility preservation was administered in 104 (8.5%) patients; seven women conceived and 5 had live births. Significant postmenopausal symptoms were present in 153 (13%) patients.

conclusionMore than half of the YBC in India were diagnosed at an advanced stage with aggressive features leading to suboptimal outcomes. Awareness via national registry and early diagnosis is highly warranted. Menopausal symptoms and fertility issues are prevalent and demand special focus.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyTertiary Health CareChemotherapyFertilityOutcomesQuality of lifeYoung breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID34655887
PMCPMC8527043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.