Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34655678›Full record

ReviewJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2021

Ultrasound-targeted nucleic acid delivery for solid tumor therapy.

Mark R Schwartz, Anna C Debski, Richard J Price

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark R SchwartzDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Anna C DebskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Richard J PriceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Electronic address: rprice@virginia.edu.

Funding

Cancer Research Training Program: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic StrategiesT32CA009109 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Andrew Carl Dudley, Melanie R Rutkowski · 1985 to 2026
$13.9M
Focused Ultrasound Regimens that Synergize with Melanoma ImmunotherapyR01EB030007 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BULLOCK, TIMOTHY N, PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2020 to 2023
$2.6M
Targeted Delivery of Brain Penetrating DNA Nanoparticles to Brain TumorsR01CA204968 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HANES, JUSTIN S., SUK, JUNG SOO · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
Genome Editing the Blood-Brain Barrier with Sonoselective Focused UltrasoundR01EB030744 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
Focused ultrasound pre-conditioning for augmented nanoparticle penetration in infiltrative gliomasR01EB030409 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HANES, JUSTIN S., PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2021 to 2024
$2.3M
ImmunoPET Assessment of anti-CD47 Immunotherapy Delivery to Glioblastoma with Focused UltrasoundR21NS118278 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2020 to 2020
$420k
Ceramide Nanoliposomes in Combination with Focused Ultrasound for Treating Breast CancerR21CA230088 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI KESTER, MARK, PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2018 to 2019
$355k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204968NCI NIH HHS R21 CA230088NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009109NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030007NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030409NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030744NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS118278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depending upon multiple factors, malignant solid tumors are conventionally treated by some combination of surgical resection, radiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Despite decades of research, therapeutic responses remain poor for many cancer indications. Further, many current therapies in our armamentarium are either invasive or accompanied by toxic side effects. In lieu of traditional pharmaceutics and invasive therapeutic interventions, gene therapies offer more flexible and potentially more durable approaches for new anti-cancer therapies. Nonetheless, many current gene delivery approaches suffer from low transfection efficiency due to physiological barriers limiting extravasation and uptake of genetic material. Additionally, systemically administered gene therapies may lack target-specificity, which can lead to off-target effects. To overcome these challenges, many preclinical studies have shown the utility of focused ultrasound (FUS) to increase macromolecule uptake in cells and tissue under image guidance, demonstrating promise for improved delivery of therapeutics to solid tumors. As FUS-based drug delivery is now being tested in several clinical trials around the world, FUS-targeted gene therapy for solid tumor therapy may not be far behind. In this review, we comprehensively cover the literature pertaining to preclinical attempts to more efficiently deliver therapeutic genetic material with FUS and offer perspectives for future studies and clinical translation.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNucleic AcidsPharmaceutical PreparationsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansUltrasonographyNucleic AcidsPharmaceutical PreparationscancerFocused ultrasoundGene deliveryUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID34655678
PMCPMC8599656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.