Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34655551›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2022

Feasibility and acceptability of a toolkit-based process to implement patient-centered, immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception services.

Michelle H Moniz, Vanessa K Dalton, Roger D Smith, Lauren E Owens, Zach Landis-Lewis, Alex F Peahl, Barbara Van Kainen, Margaret R Punch, Marisa K Wetmore, Kirsten Bonawitz and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dissemination of the Women-Centred HIV Care Model: A Multimodal Process and Evaluation.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michelle H MonizDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Program on Women's Healthcare Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: mmoniz@med.umich.edu.
Vanessa K DaltonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Program on Women's Healthcare Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Roger D SmithDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Lauren E OwensDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Zach Landis-LewisDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Alex F PeahlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Program on Women's Healthcare Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Barbara Van KainenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Margaret R PunchDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Marisa K WetmoreDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Program on Women's Healthcare Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Kirsten BonawitzUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
Giselle E KolenicDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Program on Women's Healthcare Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Christine DehlendorfDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Michele HeislerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Funding

Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Immediate Postpartum Contraception: Implementing and Evaluating Evidence-based PracticeK08HS025465 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MONIZ, MICHELLE HELENA · 2018 to 2022
$777k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS025465NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational guidelines recommend that maternity systems provide patient-centered access to immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (ie, insertion of an intrauterine device or implant during the delivery hospitalization). Hospitals face significant barriers to offering these services, and efforts to improve peripartum contraception care quality have met with mixed success. Implementation toolkits-packages of resources and strategies to facilitate the implementation of new services-are a promising approach for guiding clinical practice change.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a theory-informed toolkit, evaluate the feasibility of toolkit-based implementation of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception care in a single site, and refine the toolkit and implementation process for future effectiveness testing. STUDY

designWe conducted a single-site feasibility study of the toolkit-based implementation of immediate postpartum contraception services at a large academic medical center in 2017 to 2020. Based on previous qualitative work, we developed a theory-informed implementation toolkit. A stakeholder panel selected toolkit resources to use in a multicomponent implementation intervention at the study site. These resources included tools and strategies designed to optimize implementation conditions (ie, implementation leadership, planning, and evaluation; the financial environment; engagement of key stakeholders; patient needs; compatibility with workflow; and clinician and staff knowledge, skills, and attitudes). The implementation intervention was executed from January 2018 to April 2019. Study outcomes included implementation outcomes (ie, provider perceptions of the implementation process and implementation tools [assessed via online provider survey]) and healthcare quality outcomes (ie, trends in prenatal contraceptive counseling, trends in immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive utilization [both ascertained by institutional administrative data], and the patient experience of contraceptive care [assessed via serial, cross-sectional, online patient survey items adapted from the National Quality Forum-endorsed, validated Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling measure]).

resultsIn the implementation process, among 172 of 401 eligible clinicians (43%) participating in surveys, 70% were "extremely" or "somewhat" satisfied with the implementation process overall. In the prenatal contraceptive counseling, among 4960 individuals undergoing childbirth at the study site in 2019, 1789 (36.1%) had documented prenatal counseling about postpartum contraception. Documented counseling rates increased overall throughout 2019 (Q1, 12.5%; Q4, 51.0%) but varied significantly by clinic site (Q4, range 30%-79%). Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception utilization increased throughout the study period (before implementation, 5.46% of deliveries; during implementation, 8.95%; after implementation, 8.58%). In the patient experience of contraceptive care, patient survey respondents (response rate, 15%-29%) were largely White (344/425 [81%]) and highly educated (309/425 [73%] with at least a 4-year college degree), reflecting the study site population. Scores were poor across settings, with modest improvements in the hospital setting from 2018 to 2020 (prenatal visits, 67%-63%; hospitalization, 45%-58%; outpatient after delivery, 69%-65%). Based on these findings, toolkit refinements included additional resources designed to routinize prenatal contraceptive counseling and support a more patient-centered experience of contraceptive care.

conclusionA toolkit-based process to implement immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive services at a single academic center was associated with high acceptability but mixed healthcare quality outcomes. Toolkit resources were added to optimize counseling rates and the patient experience of contraceptive care. Future research should formally test the effectiveness of the refined toolkit in a multisite, prospective trial.

Indexed as

Long-Acting Reversible ContraceptionContraceptionContraceptive AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansPatient-Centered CarePostpartum PeriodPregnancyProspective StudiesContraceptive Agentsimplementationlong-acting reversible contraceptionpostpartum contraceptionquality improvementtoolkit

Identifiers

PMID34655551
PMCPMC8917096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.