Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34655522›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2021

Safety and immunogenicity of CpG 1018 and aluminium hydroxide-adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 S-2P protein vaccine MVC-COV1901: interim results of a large-scale, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial in Taiwan.

Szu-Min Hsieh, Ming-Che Liu, Yen-Hsu Chen, Wen-Sen Lee, Shinn-Jang Hwang, Shu-Hsing Cheng, Wen-Chien Ko, Kao-Pin Hwang, Ning-Chi Wang, Yu-Lin Lee and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04695652 (A Phase II, Prospective, Double-blinded, Multi-Center, Multi-Regional Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Candidate MVC-COV1901), which is not on this map. Cited by 76 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04695652 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II, Prospective, Double-blinded, Multi-Center, Multi-Regional Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Candidate MVC-COV1901

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedigen Vaccine Biologics Corp.Ran2020 to 2021Enrolled3,854ConditionsCovid19 VaccineArmsMVC-COV1901(S protein with adjuvant), MVC-COV1901(Saline)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry: implications for biomedical strategies.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Immune modulation to treat Alzheimer's disease.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Production and Immunogenicity Assessment of LTp50: AnPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Szu-Min HsiehDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ming-Che LiuClinical Research Centre, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Dental Technology, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yen-Hsu ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Graduate Institute of Medicine, Sepsis Research Centre, Centre of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Wen-Sen LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Taipei Municipal Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shinn-Jang HwangDepartment of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shu-Hsing ChengSchool of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Infectious Diseases, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Wen-Chien KoDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Kao-Pin HwangSchool of Medicine, China Medical University Hospital and Children Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ning-Chi WangTri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Lin LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan; Program in Medical Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yi-Ling LinInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan; Biomedical Translation Research Centre, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shin-Ru ShihResearch Centre for Emerging Viral Infections, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chung-Guei HuangResearch Centre for Emerging Viral Infections, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chun-Che LiaoInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jian-Jong LiangInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Shin ChangBiomedical Translation Research Centre, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Charles ChenMedigen Vaccine Biologics, Taipei, Taiwan; College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Chia En LienMedigen Vaccine Biologics, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
I-Chen TaiMedigen Vaccine Biologics, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: kathytai@medigenvac.com.
Tzou-Yien LinCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Paediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan. Electronic address: alinpid@gmail.com.
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica · TWChang Gung University · TWChina Medical University Hospital · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTri-Service General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMVC-COV1901, a recombinant protein vaccine containing pre-fusion-stabilised spike protein S-2P adjuvanted with CpG 1018 and aluminium hydroxide, has been shown to be well tolerated with a good safety profile in healthy adults aged 20-49 years in a phase 1 trial, and provided a good cellular and humoral immune responses. We present the interim safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity results of a phase 2 clinical trial of the MVC-COV1901 vaccine in Taiwan.

methodsThis is a large-scale, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial done at ten medical centres and one regional hospital in Taiwan. Individuals aged 20 years or older who were generally healthy or had stable pre-existing medical conditions were eligible for enrolment. Exclusion criteria included (but were not limited to) travel overseas within 14 days of screening, intention to travel overseas within 6 months of the screening visit, and the absence of prespecified medical conditions, including immunosuppressive illness, a history of autoimmune disease, malignancy with risk to recur, a bleeding disorder, uncontrolled HIV infection, uncontrolled hepatitis B and C virus infections, SARS-CoV-1 or SARS-CoV-2 infections, an allergy to any vaccine, or a serious medical condition that could interfere with the study. Study participants were randomly assigned (6:1) to receive two doses of either MVC-COV1901 or placebo, administered via intramuscular injection on day 1 and day 29. MVC-COV1901 contained 15 μg of S-2P protein adjuvanted with 750 μg CpG 1018 and 375 μg aluminium hydroxide in a 0·5 mL aqueous solution, and the placebo contained the same volume of saline. Randomisation was done centrally by use of an interactive web response system, stratified by age (≥20 to <65 years and ≥65 years). Participants and investigators were masked to group assignment. The primary outcomes were to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of MVC-COV1901 from day 1 (the day of the first dose) to day 57 (28 days after the second dose). Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring geometric mean titres (GMTs) and seroconversion rates of neutralising antibody and antigen-specific IgG in the per-protocol population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04695652.

findingsOf 4173 individuals screened between Dec 30, 2020, and April 2, 2021, 3854 were enrolled and randomly assigned: 3304 to the MVC-COV1901 group and 550 to the placebo group. A total of 3844 participants (3295 in the MVC-COV1901 group and 549 in the placebo group) were included in the safety analysis set, and 1053 participants (903 and 150) had received both doses and were included in the per-protocol immunogenicity analysis set. From the start of this phase 2 trial to the time of interim analysis, no vaccine-related serious adverse events were recorded. The most common solicited adverse events in all study participants were pain at the injection site (2346 [71·2%] of 3295 in the MVC-COV1901 group and 128 [23·3%] of 549 in the placebo group), and malaise or fatigue (1186 [36·0%] and 163 [29·7%]). Fever was rarely reported (23 [0·7%] and two [0·4%]). At 28 days after the second dose of MVC-COV1901, the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody GMT was 662·3 (95% CI 628·7-697·8; 408·5 IU/mL), the GMT ratio (geometric mean fold increase in titres at day 57 vs baseline) was 163·2 (155·0-171·9), and the seroconversion rate was 99·8% (95% CI 99·2-100·0).

interpretationMVC-COV1901 has a good safety profile and elicits promising immunogenicity responses. These data support MVC-COV1901 to enter phase 3 efficacy trials.

fundingMedigen Vaccine Biologics and Taiwan Centres for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Welfare.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAluminum HydroxideCOVID-19HIV InfectionsOligodeoxyribonucleotidesAdultAgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesDouble-Blind MethodHumansMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2TaiwanYoung AdultAdjuvants, ImmunologicAluminum HydroxideAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesMVC-COV1901 vaccineOligodeoxyribonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID34655522
PMCPMC8514195
OpenAlexW3206624478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.