Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34655457›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2022

Analysis of IgG, IgA and IgM antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 in convalescent and vaccinated patients with the Pfizer-BioNTech and CanSinoBio vaccines.

Edgar A Melgoza-González, Diana Hinojosa-Trujillo, Mónica Reséndiz-Sandoval, Verónica Mata-Haro, Sofía Hernández-Valenzuela, Melissa García-Vega, Marlene Bravo-Parra, Aldo A Arvizu-Flores, Olivia Valenzuela, Edgar Velázquez and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Edgar A Melgoza-GonzálezLaboratorio de Inmunología, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Diana Hinojosa-TrujilloLaboratorio de Inmunología, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Mónica Reséndiz-SandovalLaboratorio de Inmunología, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Verónica Mata-HaroLaboratorio de Microbiología e Inmunología, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C, Hermosillo, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7394-4569
Sofía Hernández-ValenzuelaLaboratorio de Inmunología, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Melissa García-VegaLaboratorio de Inmunología, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Marlene Bravo-ParraLaboratorio de Microbiología e Inmunología, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Aldo A Arvizu-FloresDepartamento de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, División de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Olivia ValenzuelaDepartamento de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, División de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4456-2107
Edgar VelázquezCentro Estatal de la Transfusión Sanguínea, Secretaria de Salud del Estado de Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Alan Soto-GaxiolaHospital General del Estado de Sonora "Dr. Ernesto Ramos Bours", Secretaria de Salud del Estado de Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Martha B Gómez-MezaDepartamento de Hematología y Banco de Sangre, Ciudad de México, Hospital Central Norte Pemex, Mexico.
Fernando Pérez-JacoboUniversidad del Valle de México, Campus Hermosillo, Hermosillo, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0295-5508
Luis VillelaUniversidad del Valle de México, Campus Hermosillo, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Jesús HernándezLaboratorio de Inmunología, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C, Hermosillo, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5131-3600
Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo · MXSecretaria de Salud · MXUniversidad de Sonora · MXPemex (Mexico) · MXUniversidad de Hermosillo · MXUniversidad del Valle de México · MX

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) 314320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 virus was detected for the first time in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Currently, this virus has spread around the world, and new variants have emerged. This new pandemic virus provoked the rapid development of diagnostic tools, therapies and vaccines to control this new disease called COVID-19. Antibody detection by ELISA has been broadly used to recognize the number of persons infected with this virus or to evaluate the response of vaccinated individuals. As the pandemic spread, new questions arose, such as the prevalence of antibodies after natural infection and the response induced by the different vaccines. In Mexico, as in other countries, mRNA and viral-vectored vaccines have been widely used among the population. In this work, we developed an indirect ELISA test to evaluate S1 antibodies in convalescent and vaccinated individuals. By using this test, we showed that IgG antibodies against the S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 were detected up to 42 weeks after the onset of the symptoms, in contrast to IgA and IgM, which decreased 14 weeks after the onset of symptoms. The evaluation of the antibody response in individuals vaccinated with Pfizer-BioNTech and CanSinoBio vaccines showed no differences 2 weeks after vaccination. However, after completing the two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech and the one dose of CanSinoBio, a significantly higher response of IgG antibodies was observed in persons vaccinated with Pfizer-BioNTech than in those vaccinated with CanSinoBio. In conclusion, these results confirm that after natural infection with SARS-CoV-2, it is possible to detect antibodies for up to 10 months. Additionally, our results showed that one dose of the CanSinoBio vaccine induces a lower response of IgG antibodies than that induced by the complete scheme of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

Indexed as

COVID-19Viral VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Viral VaccinesantibodiesCanSinoBioCOVID-19ELISAPfizer-BioNTechS1SARS-CoV-2vaccine

Identifiers

PMID34655457
PMCPMC8662108
OpenAlexW3206705260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.