Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34655456›Full record

ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2022

A comparative study of mesenchymal stem cells cultured as cell-only aggregates and in encapsulated hydrogels.

Fiona R Passanha, David B Gomes, Justyna Piotrowska, Students of PRO3011, Lorenzo Moroni, Matthew B Baker, Vanessa L S LaPointe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. PET/EVOH nonwoven fabrics supportRegenerative therapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fiona R PassanhaDepartment of Cell Biology-Inspired Tissue Engineering, MERLN Institute for Technology- Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
David B GomesDepartment of Complex Tissue Regeneration, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Justyna PiotrowskaDepartment of Cell Biology-Inspired Tissue Engineering, MERLN Institute for Technology- Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Students of PRO3011Department of Cell Biology-Inspired Tissue Engineering, MERLN Institute for Technology- Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lorenzo MoroniDepartment of Complex Tissue Regeneration, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Matthew B BakerDepartment of Complex Tissue Regeneration, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Vanessa L S LaPointeDepartment of Cell Biology-Inspired Tissue Engineering, MERLN Institute for Technology- Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

AO Foundation S-14-29LDutch Province of LimburgH2020 European Research Council 637308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that cells cultured in three-dimensional (3D) settings have superior performance compared to their traditional counterparts in monolayers. This has been attributed to cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions that more closely resemble the in vivo tissue architecture. The rapid adoption of 3D cell culture systems as experimental tools for diverse applications has not always been matched by an improved understanding of cell behavior in different 3D environments. Here, we studied human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (hMSCs) as scaffold-free self-assembled aggregates of low and high cell number and compared them to cell-laden alginate hydrogels with and without arginine-glycine-aspartic acid peptides. We observed a significant decrease in the size of cell-only aggregates over 14 days in culture compared to the cells encapsulated in alginate hydrogels. Alginate hydrogels had persistently more living cells for a longer period (14 days) in culture as measured by total DNA content. Proliferation studies revealed that a weeklong culture of hMSCs in 3D culture, whether as aggregates or cell-laden alginate hydrogels, reduced their proliferation over time. Cell cycle analysis found no significant differences between days 1 and 7 for the different culture systems. The findings of this study improve our understanding of how aggregate cultures differ with or without a hydrogel carrier, and whether aggregation itself is important when it comes to the 3D culture of hMSCs.

Indexed as

HydrogelsMesenchymal Stem CellsAlginatesCells, CulturedExtracellular MatrixHumansPeptidesAlginatesHydrogelsPeptides3D cell culturealginate hydrogelsregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID34655456
PMCPMC9297862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.