Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34655377›Full record

Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2022

Evaluation of a uniplanar pupil expansion ring in small-pupil cataract surgery: a feasibility study.

Flore Salviat, Jean-Luc Febbraro, Kevin Zuber, Amélie Yavchitz, Sarah Moran, Damien Gatinel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02434588 (Evaluation of an Iris Dilatation Ring in Cataract Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02434588 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of an Iris Dilatation Ring in Cataract Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildRan2015 to 2018Enrolled25ConditionsSmall PupilArmsBhattacharjee ring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Flore SalviatDepartment of Clinical Research, Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France.
Jean-Luc FebbraroDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France. sarmoran@gmail.com.
Kevin ZuberDepartment of Clinical Research, Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France.
Amélie YavchitzDepartment of Clinical Research, Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France.
Sarah MoranDepartment of Ophthalmology, South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital, Cork, Ireland. sarmoran@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3081-705X
Damien GatinelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France.
Fondation de Rothschild · FRSouth Infirmary Victoria University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a disposable uniplanar pupil expansion device in small-pupil cataract surgery.

methodsThis is a feasibility study carried out at the Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France. Patients undergoing routine cataract surgery with a dilated pupil size < 6 mm, and who agreed to participate in the study were included. The trial enrolled 25 patients, of whom 21 proceeded to cataract surgery using the pupil expansion device to be evaluated. The pupil diameter was measured at defined stages during the cataract surgery, which was performed by a single surgeon, in a single center setting. The 1st generation Bhattacharjee pupil expansion ring was used if the preoperative pupil size was < 6 mm. Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events were recorded.

resultsPupil size immediately after the Bhattacharjee ring implantation was ≥ 6 mm for 15 eyes (71.4%). The mean dilated pupil size before ring insertion was 4.5 ± 0.8 mm (range 2.5-5.8 mm), and the mean pupil size after ring insertion was 6.1 ± 0.3 mm (range 5.9-6.8 mm). Mean pupil size following removal of the ring was 4.2 ± 0.8 mm (range 2.5-5.4 mm). Two adverse events occurred during the surgeries: 1 Bhattacharjee ring broke prior to implantation, and 1 implanted Bhattacharjee ring was unstable and removed before the end of the surgery. No postoperative adverse event was recorded.

conclusionsThe Bhattacharjee ring is an effective pupil expansion device, which facilitates stable pupil expansion during cataract surgery. This study was registered as a clinical trial at clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT02434588.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionPhacoemulsificationFeasibility StudiesHumansMiosisPupilCataract surgeryIntraoperative floppy irisPupil expansionSmall pupil

Identifiers

PMID34655377
OpenAlexW3205057009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.