Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2022
Evaluation of a uniplanar pupil expansion ring in small-pupil cataract surgery: a feasibility study.
Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02434588 (Evaluation of an Iris Dilatation Ring in Cataract Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of an Iris Dilatation Ring in Cataract Surgery
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- B-Hex, an ace up the sleeve for small pupil phacoemulsification.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyArticle
- Real-world uptake of an innovative pupil expander device for cataract surgery: Implementation lessons learnt.The Indian journal of medical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a disposable uniplanar pupil expansion device in small-pupil cataract surgery.
methodsThis is a feasibility study carried out at the Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France. Patients undergoing routine cataract surgery with a dilated pupil size < 6 mm, and who agreed to participate in the study were included. The trial enrolled 25 patients, of whom 21 proceeded to cataract surgery using the pupil expansion device to be evaluated. The pupil diameter was measured at defined stages during the cataract surgery, which was performed by a single surgeon, in a single center setting. The 1st generation Bhattacharjee pupil expansion ring was used if the preoperative pupil size was < 6 mm. Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events were recorded.
resultsPupil size immediately after the Bhattacharjee ring implantation was ≥ 6 mm for 15 eyes (71.4%). The mean dilated pupil size before ring insertion was 4.5 ± 0.8 mm (range 2.5-5.8 mm), and the mean pupil size after ring insertion was 6.1 ± 0.3 mm (range 5.9-6.8 mm). Mean pupil size following removal of the ring was 4.2 ± 0.8 mm (range 2.5-5.4 mm). Two adverse events occurred during the surgeries: 1 Bhattacharjee ring broke prior to implantation, and 1 implanted Bhattacharjee ring was unstable and removed before the end of the surgery. No postoperative adverse event was recorded.
conclusionsThe Bhattacharjee ring is an effective pupil expansion device, which facilitates stable pupil expansion during cataract surgery. This study was registered as a clinical trial at clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT02434588.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.