ArticleCell and tissue banking2022
Blood and bone marrow donor registry of Istanbul medical faculty activity and experience in past 3 years : A cross-sectional documentation of TRIS activity: the first blood and marrow registry in Turkey.
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cord blood banking and transplantation.Cell and tissue banking · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) offers a potential cure for some hematological malignancies. For those patients without a family donor, unrelated donor (MUD) registries serve for identifying the best donor. In the present study, we aimed to give a cross-sectional report of our registry's activity and experience as the first established national MUD registry in the country. The study is retrospective and covers the period of 2016 to 2019. A total of 1855 donor searches were performed, and 642 were included in the study. All data were electronically obtained from the institutional database system. All SCTs were either 10/10 or 9/10 HLA matched and originated from an international registry. The most preferred stem cell source was peripheral blood (70.2%). A quarter of transplants were performed using bone marrow, and cord blood was used with a rate of 1.4%. The pandemic-related problems were similar for the other two national registries. During the pandemic, 71 of 432 patients who were searched for donors underwent stem cell transplant(SCT). The low number was related mostly with postponing of SCTs and/also difficulties in continuing of volunteering and in achievement of stem cells from international registry. During the Covid19 pandemic, the SCT activity of centers decreased according to the national, and international guidelines. The study revealed an organized, and multidirectional capacity of the registry and also the adaptation to unpredicted conditions such as pandemic. On the other hand, there is a need for more effective strategies for donor recruitment and retention programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.