Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34655344›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2022

Raising the level: orangutans solve the floating peanut task without visual feedback.

Carla Sebastián-Enesco, Nerea Amezcua-Valmala, Fernando Colmenares, Natacha Mendes, Josep Call

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The irreconcilability of insight.Animal cognition · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carla Sebastián-EnescoGrupo UCM de Psicobiología social, evolutiva y comparada, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. carla.sebastian@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7340-0038
Nerea Amezcua-ValmalaGrupo UCM de Psicobiología social, evolutiva y comparada, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Fernando ColmenaresGrupo UCM de Psicobiología social, evolutiva y comparada, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Natacha MendesMax Planck School of Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Josep CallSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St. Andrews, UK.

Funding

Comunidad de Madrid CCG07-UCM/SAL-2578Universidad Complutense de Madrid UCM-BSCH GR58/08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimpanzees and orangutans are able to generate innovative behaviors to solve complicated physical problems. For example, when presented with an out-of-reach peanut at the bottom of a vertical tube (floating peanut task-FPT), some of them spontaneously spit water into the tube until the peanut floats to the top. Yet, it is unclear whether this innovative solution results from repeating those actions that bring the peanut incrementally closer to the top or from anticipating the solution before acting. In the current study, we addressed this question by presenting three naïve orangutans with an opaque version of the FPT that prevented them from obtaining visual information about the effect of their actions on the position of the peanut. One of the subjects solved the opaque FPT in the very first trial: he collected water from the faucet and poured it into the opaque tube repeatedly until the hitherto non-visible peanut reached the top. This provides evidence for the first time that orangutans can potentially solve the FPT without relying on sensorimotor learning, but to some extent by mentally representing the problem.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryPongoAnimalsArachisMalePan troglodytesPongo pygmaeusFloating peanut taskInnovationInsightOrangutansTool useVisual feedback

Identifiers

PMID34655344
PMCPMC8800926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.