ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2022
Assessment of the routine reporting of very low-dose exercise-first myocardial perfusion SPECT from a large-scale real-world cohort and correlation with the subsequent reporting of coronary stenosis at angiography.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Routine first-line detection of breast cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity by serial, fast and ultra-low-dose equilibrium radionuclide angiography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOur study assesses the routine reporting of exercise ischemia using very low-dose exercise-first myocardial perfusion SPECT in a large number of patients and under real-life conditions, by evaluating correlations with the subsequent routine reporting of coronary stenosis by angiography and with factors that predict ischemia.
methodsData from 13,126 routine exercise MPI reports, from 11,952 patients (31% women), using very low doses of sestamibi and a high-sensitivity cardiac CZT camera, were extracted to assess the reporting of significant MPI-ischemia (> 1 left ventricular segment), to determine the MPI normalcy rate in a group with < 5% pretest probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) (n = 378), and to assess the ability of MPI to predict a > 50% coronary stenosis in patients with available coronary angiography reports in the 3 months after the MPI (n = 713).
resultsThe median effective patient dose was 2.51 [IQR: 1.00-4.71] mSv. The normalcy rate was 98%, and the MPI-ischemia rate was independently predicted by a known CAD, the male gender, obesity, and a < 50% LV ejection fraction, ranging from 29.5% with all these risk factors represented to 1.5% when there were no risk factors. A > 50% coronary stenosis was significantly predicted by MPI-ischemia, less significantly for mild (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.61 [1.26-1.96]) than for moderate-to-severe MPI-ischemia (4.05 [3.53-4.57]) and was also impacted by having a known CAD (2.17 [1.83-2.51]), by a submaximal exercise test (1.48 [1.15-1.81]) and being ≥ 65 years of age (1.43 [1.11-1.76]).
conclusionIschemia detected using a very low-dose exercise-first MPI protocol in a large-scale clinical cohort and under real-life routine conditions is a highly significant predictor for the subsequent reporting of coronary stenosis, although this prediction is enhanced by other variables. This weakly irradiating approach is amenable to being repeated at shorter time intervals, in target patient groups with a high probability of MPI-ischemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.