Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34655259›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Classification of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by brain volume, connectivity, and network dynamics.

Janine Thome, Robert Steinbach, Julian Grosskreutz, Daniel Durstewitz, Georgia Koppe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Autonomic dysfunction in neurodegenerative disease.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Generative dynamical models for classification of rsfMRI data.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janine ThomeDepartment of Theoretical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0215-2097
Robert SteinbachHans Berger Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3936-6010
Julian GrosskreutzPrecision Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
Daniel DurstewitzDepartment of Theoretical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany.
Georgia KoppeDepartment of Theoretical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging studies corroborate the importance of neuroimaging biomarkers and machine learning to improve diagnostic classification of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). While most studies focus on structural data, recent studies assessing functional connectivity between brain regions by linear methods highlight the role of brain function. These studies have yet to be combined with brain structure and nonlinear functional features. We investigate the role of linear and nonlinear functional brain features, and the benefit of combining brain structure and function for ALS classification. ALS patients (N = 97) and healthy controls (N = 59) underwent structural and functional resting state magnetic resonance imaging. Based on key hubs of resting state networks, we defined three feature sets comprising brain volume, resting state functional connectivity (rsFC), as well as (nonlinear) resting state dynamics assessed via recurrent neural networks. Unimodal and multimodal random forest classifiers were built to classify ALS. Out-of-sample prediction errors were assessed via five-fold cross-validation. Unimodal classifiers achieved a classification accuracy of 56.35-61.66%. Multimodal classifiers outperformed unimodal classifiers achieving accuracies of 62.85-66.82%. Evaluating the ranking of individual features' importance scores across all classifiers revealed that rsFC features were most dominant in classification. While univariate analyses revealed reduced rsFC in ALS patients, functional features more generally indicated deficits in information integration across resting state brain networks in ALS. The present work undermines that combining brain structure and function provides an additional benefit to diagnostic classification, as indicated by multimodal classifiers, while emphasizing the importance of capturing both linear and nonlinear functional brain properties to identify discriminative biomarkers of ALS.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisBrainConnectomeDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedALSamyotrophic lateral sclerosisbrain volumeclassificationdeep learningdynamical systemsfunctional connectivitynetwork dynamicsneurodegenerationneuroimagingrecurrent neural networksresting state fMRI

Identifiers

PMID34655259
PMCPMC8720197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.