Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34655041›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2022

Manufacturing readiness assessment for evaluation of the microneedle array patch industry: an exploration of barriers to full-scale manufacturing.

Ben Creelman, Collrane Frivold, Sierra Jessup, Gene Saxon, Courtney Jarrahian

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Enhancing vaccine stability in transdermal microneedle platforms.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Microneedle Sensors for Point-of-Care Diagnostics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Industrial perspectives for personalized microneedles.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ben CreelmanPATH (Medical Devices and Health Technologies Program), Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4704-054X
Collrane FrivoldPATH (Medical Devices and Health Technologies Program), Seattle, WA, USA.
Sierra JessupPATH (Medical Devices and Health Technologies Program), Seattle, WA, USA.
Gene SaxonPATH (Medical Devices and Health Technologies Program), Seattle, WA, USA.
Courtney JarrahianPATH (Medical Devices and Health Technologies Program), Seattle, WA, USA. cjarrahian@path.org.ORCID 0000-0003-3046-6891
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microneedle array patch (MAP) technology is a promising new delivery technology for vaccines and pharmaceuticals, yet due to several differing and novel production methods, barriers to full-scale manufacturing exist. PATH conducted a manufacturing readiness assessment and follow-up interviews to identify both the current manufacturing readiness of the industry as well as how readiness varies by developer type and MAP type. Follow-up interviews identified barriers the industry faces in reaching full manufacturing readiness, including the perceived regulatory and investment risk of manufacturing MAPs at scale due to quality requirements and control methods, uncertain sterility requirements, lack of standard production methods (especially around dissolvable MAP drying methods), and the lack of available contract manufacturing organizations with MAP manufacturing capabilities. A Regulatory Working Group has been established to identify and address critical quality issues specific to MAP manufacturing with the aim of providing developers insight into what will be expected for MAP product approvals. Standardizing MAP production equipment and automatic, visual quality control could reduce the overall investment risk to developers and contract manufacturing organizations in pursuing pilot-scale manufacturing capabilities and ultimately lower barriers to the scale-up of full medical MAP product lines.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsVaccinesCommercePharmaceutical PreparationsQuality ControlPharmaceutical PreparationsVaccinesCritical quality attributesManufacturing barriersMicroneedle patchProductionQuality controlScale-up

Identifiers

PMID34655041
PMCPMC8724218
OpenAlexW3154665929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.