Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34654935›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2021

[Rehabilitation following total knee replacement].

Bernd Kladny

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. [AI in rehabilitation-application of artificial mental models for personalized medicine].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bernd Kladnym&i Fachklinik Herzogenaurach, In der Reuth 1, 91074, Erlangen, Deutschland. bernd.kladny@fachklinik-herzogenaurach.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal knee replacement requires follow-up treatment. This can take place on an outpatient basis as part of health insurance coverage, but also as outpatient or inpatient rehabilitation. KIND OF REHABILITATION: Outpatient rehabilitation provides comparable results to inpatient rehabilitation, but only for those patients who are suitable for outpatient rehabilitation. Inpatient rehabilitation should be indicated depending on general health status, general physical fitness, housing situation, accessibility of rehabilitation facilities and possibilities of social support in the home environment, as well as age and comorbidities. Physiotherapeutic procedures should focus on exercise therapy. Passive reactive measures complement the therapy. For patients of working age, the activity profile should be considered as part of the rehabilitation process. Patient education, with information on prosthesis-appropriate behavior, represents an important component in follow-up treatment. PROSPECT: Demographic change requires increasing consideration of orthogeriatric aspects. Fast-track programs will not make follow-up treatment superfluous, but with accelerated processes they represent a new challenge for sectoral cooperation.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeExercise TherapyHumansInpatientsTreatment OutcomeExercise therapyInpatientsKnee arthroplasty, totalOutpatientsPhysiotherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.