Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34654853›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Deep post-GWAS analysis identifies potential risk genes and risk variants for Alzheimer's disease, providing new insights into its disease mechanisms.

Zhen Wang, Quanwei Zhang, Jhih-Rong Lin, M Reza Jabalameli, Joydeep Mitra, Nha Nguyen, Zhengdong D Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. From adolescence to Alzheimer's: a neurodevelopmental lifespan model of cognitive vulnerability.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The proteomic landscape of microglia in health and disease.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Zhen WangCollege of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Quanwei ZhangDepartment of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Jhih-Rong LinDepartment of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
M Reza JabalameliDepartment of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Joydeep MitraDepartment of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Nha NguyenDepartment of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Zhengdong D ZhangDepartment of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. zhengdong.zhang@einsteinmed.org.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Resilience to Alzheimer's disease in humans with exceptional longevityR01AG057909 · NIA · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI BARZILAI, NIR J, ZHANG, ZHENGDONG · 2017 to 2021
$6.2M
Interpreting human enhancer variants with a network-regularized composite modelR01HG008153 · NHGRI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI ZHANG, ZHENGDONG · 2016 to 2018
$3.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008153NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a genetically complex, multifactorial neurodegenerative disease. It affects more than 45 million people worldwide and currently remains untreatable. Although genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified many AD-associated common variants, only about 25 genes are currently known to affect the risk of developing AD, despite its highly polygenic nature. Moreover, the risk variants underlying GWAS AD-association signals remain unknown. Here, we describe a deep post-GWAS analysis of AD-associated variants, using an integrated computational framework for predicting both disease genes and their risk variants. We identified 342 putative AD risk genes in 203 risk regions spanning 502 AD-associated common variants. 246 AD risk genes have not been identified as AD risk genes by previous GWAS collected in GWAS catalogs, and 115 of 342 AD risk genes are outside the risk regions, likely under the regulation of transcriptional regulatory elements contained therein. Even more significantly, for 109 AD risk genes, we predicted 150 risk variants, of both coding and regulatory (in promoters or enhancers) types, and 85 (57%) of them are supported by functional annotation. In-depth functional analyses showed that AD risk genes were overrepresented in AD-related pathways or GO terms-e.g., the complement and coagulation cascade and phosphorylation and activation of immune response-and their expression was relatively enriched in microglia, endothelia, and pericytes of the human brain. We found nine AD risk genes-e.g., IL1RAP, PMAIP1, LAMTOR4-as predictors for the prognosis of AD survival and genes such as ARL6IP5 with altered network connectivity between AD patients and normal individuals involved in AD progression. Our findings open new strategies for developing therapeutics targeting AD risk genes or risk variants to influence AD pathogenesis.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBrainGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID34654853
PMCPMC8519945
OpenAlexW3207476320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.