Signs of long-term corneal nerve deterioration after uneventful cataract surgery.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Association between refractive status and quantitative corneal subbasal nerve plexus parameters in young adults.BMC ophthalmology · 2026
   Article
2. In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of the Cornea in Diagnosing Small Fibre Neuropathy: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Article
3. Tissue Damage on Ocular Surface After Combined Phacoemulsification with Limbal Relaxing Incision Compared with Standard Phacoemulsification.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Cataract surgery and dry eye disease: A review.2020

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as