Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34654596›Full record

Observational studyChinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi2021

Pattern of injuries due to wild animal attack among patients presenting to the emergency department: A retrospective observational study.

Pradeep Kumar Singh, S Manwar Ali, Rakesh Vadakkethil Radhakrishnan, Chitta Ranjan Mohanty, Manas Ranjan Sahu, Bishnu Prasad Patro, Ijas Ms, Susant Kumar Panda

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pradeep Kumar SinghDepartment of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
S Manwar AliDepartment of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
Rakesh Vadakkethil RadhakrishnanCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
Chitta Ranjan MohantyDepartment of Trauma and Emergency, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India. Electronic address: drchitta8@gmail.com.
Manas Ranjan SahuDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
Bishnu Prasad PatroDepartment of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
Ijas MsDepartment of Trauma and Emergency, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
Susant Kumar PandaDepartment of General Surgery, District Head Quarter Hospital, Angul, Odisha, 759122, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INLourdes Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe human-wildlife conflicts (HWCs) causing nuisances and injuries are becoming a growing public health concern over recent years worldwide. We aimed to study the demographic profile, mode of injury, pattern of injury, and outcome of wild animal attack victims presented to the emergency department.

methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the emergency department of a tertiary-care hospital in Eastern India. Data were retrieved from the medical records from May 2017 to May 2021. Patients of all ages and genders attacked by wild animals and secondary injuries were included in this study. Patients with incomplete data, injuries due to the attack of stray and domestic animals and trauma due to other causes were excluded. Demographic profile, mode of injury, the pattern of injury, injury severity score (ISS), radiological pattern, and outcome were recorded. Statistical analysis with R (version 3.6.1.) was conducted.

resultsA total of 411 wild animal attack victims were studied, of which 374 (90.9%) were snakebite injuries and 37 (9.1%) were wild mammalian (WM) attack injuries. The mean age of WM attack victims was 46 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 4:1. Elephant attack injury (40.5%) was the most common WM attack injury reported. Most WM attacks (43.2%) occurred between 4:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. The median ISS was 18.5 (13-28), where 54.2% of patients had polytrauma (ISS>15). Elephant attack was associated with a higher ISS, but the difference was not significant compared to other animal types (p = 0.2). Blunt trauma was common pattern of injury in the elephant attack injury cases. Lacerations and soft tissue injuries were common patterns in other animal attacks. Among snakebites, neurotoxic was the most common type (55.4%), and lower extremity was the most common site involved.

conclusionThe young male population is the major victim of HWCs; and elephant is the most common animal involved. There is a need to design scientifically sound preventive strategies for HWCs and to strengthen the preparedness in health establishments to manage victims effectively.

Indexed as

Animals, WildEmergency Service, HospitalAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesElephantInjury severity scorePolytraumaWild animalWild boar

Identifiers

PMID34654596
PMCPMC8606701
OpenAlexW3199707441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.