Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34654483›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2021

Parasitism by endoparasitoid wasps alters the internal but not the external microbiome in host caterpillars.

Gabriele Gloder, Mitchel E Bourne, Christel Verreth, Liesbet Wilberts, Sofie Bossaert, Sam Crauwels, Marcel Dicke, Erik H Poelman, Hans Jacquemyn, Bart Lievens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effect ofInsects · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Gabriele GloderCMPG Laboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management (PME&BIM), Department M2S, KU Leuven, Willem De Croylaan 46, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4029-9882
Mitchel E BourneLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8148-9586
Christel VerrethCMPG Laboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management (PME&BIM), Department M2S, KU Leuven, Willem De Croylaan 46, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Liesbet WilbertsCMPG Laboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management (PME&BIM), Department M2S, KU Leuven, Willem De Croylaan 46, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5582-8767
Sofie BossaertCMPG Laboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management (PME&BIM), Department M2S, KU Leuven, Willem De Croylaan 46, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-0816
Sam CrauwelsCMPG Laboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management (PME&BIM), Department M2S, KU Leuven, Willem De Croylaan 46, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7675-5301
Marcel DickeLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8565-8896
Erik H PoelmanLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3285-613X
Hans JacquemynLeuven Plant Institute (LPI), KU Leuven, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9600-5794
Bart LievensCMPG Laboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management (PME&BIM), Department M2S, KU Leuven, Willem De Croylaan 46, 3001, Leuven, Belgium. bart.lievens@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7698-6641
KU Leuven · BEWageningen University & Research · NLEcologie Microbienne Lyon · FR

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek FWOFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G.0961.19NNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek ALWOP.343Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek ALWOP.368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe microbiome of many insects consists of a diverse community of microorganisms that can play critical roles in the functioning and overall health of their hosts. Although the microbial communities of insects have been studied thoroughly over the past decade, little is still known about how biotic interactions affect the microbial community structure in and on the bodies of insects. In insects that are attacked by parasites or parasitoids, it can be expected that the microbiome of the host insect is affected by the presence of these parasitic organisms that develop in close association with their host. In this study, we used high-throughput amplicon sequencing targeting both bacteria and fungi to test the hypothesis that parasitism by the endoparasitoid Cotesia glomerata affected the microbiome of its host Pieris brassicae. Healthy and parasitized caterpillars were collected from both natural populations and a laboratory culture.

resultsSignificant differences in bacterial community structure were found between field-collected caterpillars and laboratory-reared caterpillars, and between the external and the internal microbiome of the caterpillars. Parasitism significantly altered the internal microbiome of caterpillars, but not the external microbiome. The internal microbiome of all parasitized caterpillars and of the parasitoid larvae in the caterpillar hosts was dominated by a Wolbachia strain, which was completely absent in healthy caterpillars, suggesting that the strain was transferred to the caterpillars during oviposition by the parasitoids.

conclusionWe conclude that biotic interactions such as parasitism have pronounced effects on the microbiome of an insect host and possibly affect interactions with higher-order insects.

Indexed as

Cotesia glomerataMicrobial communityParasitismPieris brassicaeTrophic interactionsWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID34654483
PMCPMC8520287
OpenAlexW3205642004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.