Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34654476›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2021

Biogeographic traits of dimethyl sulfide and dimethylsulfoniopropionate cycling in polar oceans.

Zhao-Jie Teng, Qi-Long Qin, Weipeng Zhang, Jian Li, Hui-Hui Fu, Peng Wang, Musheng Lan, Guangfu Luo, Jianfeng He, Andrew McMinn and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Zhao-Jie Teng *State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Marine Biotechnology Research Center, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, China.
Qi-Long Qin *State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Marine Biotechnology Research Center, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, China.
Weipeng ZhangCollege of Marine Life Sciences, Institute for Advanced Ocean Study, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Jian LiState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Marine Biotechnology Research Center, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, China.
Hui-Hui FuCollege of Marine Life Sciences, Institute for Advanced Ocean Study, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Peng WangCollege of Marine Life Sciences, Institute for Advanced Ocean Study, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Musheng LanThe Key Laboratory for Polar Science MNR, Polar Research Institute of China, Shanghai, 200136, China.
Guangfu LuoThe Key Laboratory for Polar Science MNR, Polar Research Institute of China, Shanghai, 200136, China.
Jianfeng HeThe Key Laboratory for Polar Science MNR, Polar Research Institute of China, Shanghai, 200136, China.
Andrew McMinnInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Min WangCollege of Marine Life Sciences, Institute for Advanced Ocean Study, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Xiu-Lan ChenCollege of Marine Life Sciences, Institute for Advanced Ocean Study, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Yu-Zhong ZhangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Marine Biotechnology Research Center, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, China.
Yin ChenCollege of Marine Life Sciences, Institute for Advanced Ocean Study, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China. Y.Chen.25@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-4276
Chun-Yang LiCollege of Marine Life Sciences, Institute for Advanced Ocean Study, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China. lcy@ouc.edu.cn.
Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology · CNShandong University · CNPolar Research Institute of China · CNOcean University of China · CNUniversity of Tasmania · AUUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDimethyl sulfide (DMS) is the dominant volatile organic sulfur in global oceans. The predominant source of oceanic DMS is the cleavage of dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP), which can be produced by marine bacteria and phytoplankton. Polar oceans, which represent about one fifth of Earth's surface, contribute significantly to the global oceanic DMS sea-air flux. However, a global overview of DMS and DMSP cycling in polar oceans is still lacking and the key genes and the microbial assemblages involved in DMSP/DMS transformation remain to be fully unveiled.

resultsHere, we systematically investigated the biogeographic traits of 16 key microbial enzymes involved in DMS/DMSP cycling in 60 metagenomic samples from polar waters, together with 174 metagenome and 151 metatranscriptomes from non-polar Tara Ocean dataset. Our analyses suggest that intense DMS/DMSP cycling occurs in the polar oceans. DMSP demethylase (DmdA), DMSP lyases (DddD, DddP, and DddK), and trimethylamine monooxygenase (Tmm, which oxidizes DMS to dimethylsulfoxide) were the most prevalent bacterial genes involved in global DMS/DMSP cycling. Alphaproteobacteria (Pelagibacterales) and Gammaproteobacteria appear to play prominent roles in DMS/DMSP cycling in polar oceans. The phenomenon that multiple DMS/DMSP cycling genes co-occurred in the same bacterial genome was also observed in metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs) from polar oceans. The microbial assemblages from the polar oceans were significantly correlated with water depth rather than geographic distance, suggesting the differences of habitats between surface and deep waters rather than dispersal limitation are the key factors shaping microbial assemblages involved in DMS/DMSP cycling in polar oceans.

conclusionsOverall, this study provides a global overview of the biogeographic traits of known bacterial genes involved in DMS/DMSP cycling from the Arctic and Antarctic oceans, laying a solid foundation for further studies of DMS/DMSP cycling in polar ocean microbiome at the enzymatic, metabolic, and processual levels. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

SeawaterOceans and SeasPhylogenySulfidesSulfonium Compoundsdimethylpropiothetindimethyl sulfideSulfidesSulfonium CompoundsDMS/DMSP cyclingGeographic distributionPhylogenetic diversityPolar oceans

Identifiers

PMID34654476
PMCPMC8520302
OpenAlexW3205753679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.