ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2021
Multi-channel lung sounds intelligent diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Audio-based digital biomarkers in diagnosing and managing respiratory diseases: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence-Powered Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Detection Techniques-A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Assessing the Impact of New Technologies on Managing Chronic Respiratory Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Identification of diagnostic biomarkers and immune cell profiles associated with COPD integrated bioinformatics and machine learning.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- An explainable artificial intelligence framework for risk prediction of COPD in smokers.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Deep learning-based lung sound analysis for intelligent stethoscope.Military Medical Research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic respiratory disease that seriously threatens people's health, with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. At present, the clinical diagnosis methods of COPD are time-consuming, invasive, and radioactive. Therefore, it is urgent to develop a non-invasive and rapid COPD severity diagnosis technique suitable for daily screening in clinical practice.
resultsThis study established an effective model for the preliminary diagnosis of COPD severity using lung sounds with few channels. Firstly, the time-frequency-energy features of 12 channels lung sounds were extracted by Hilbert-Huang transform. And then, channels and features were screened by the reliefF algorithm. Finally, the feature sets were input into a support vector machine to diagnose COPD severity, and the performance with Bayes, decision tree, and deep belief network was compared. Experimental results show that high classification performance using only 4-channel lung sounds of L1, L2, L3, and L4 channels can be achieved by the proposed model. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of mild COPD and moderate + severe COPD were 89.13%, 87.72%, and 91.01%, respectively. The classification performance rates of moderate COPD and severe COPD were 94.26%, 97.32%, and 89.93% for accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively.
conclusionThis model provides a standardized evaluation with high classification performance rates, which can assist doctors to complete the preliminary diagnosis of COPD severity immediately, and has important clinical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.