Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34654333›Full record

ReviewJournal of primary care & community health

Vulnerability and Primary Health Care: An Integrative Literature Review.

Janise Braga Barros Ferreira, Luciane Loures Dos Santos, Luciana Cisoto Ribeiro, Belkiss Rolim Rodrigues Fracon, Sabrina Wong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janise Braga Barros FerreiraUniversity of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7480-937X
Luciane Loures Dos SantosUniversity of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Luciana Cisoto RibeiroUniversity of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Belkiss Rolim Rodrigues FraconUniversity of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Sabrina WongUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to analyze the evidence available in the scientific literature on the concept of vulnerability, in theoretical perspectives and its use, in Primary Health Care. An integrative literature review was carried out with the inclusion criteria: articles in English, full text, peerreviewed, related to vulnerability and primary health care, with the explicit concept of vulnerability, and published until July 31, 2020. The electronic databases accessed were by crossing the descriptors "vulnerability," "vulnerabilities," "primary health care," "primary healthcare," and "primary care." The final sample consisted of 19 articles. The thematic analysis produced 2 themes: "Theoretical foundations of the concept of vulnerability" and "The use of the concept of vulnerability in PHC." In the second theme, 2 sub-themes emerged: Evaluation of health policies, programs, and services and Classification of individuals, groups, and families. There was a plurality of theoretical foundations for the concept of vulnerability and a smaller scope of its use in Primary Health Care. It is expected that the study will subsidize public policymakers and health teams in the design of services and actions aimed at vulnerable populations and in situations of vulnerability.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareVulnerable PopulationsHealth PolicyHumansconcept formationhealth vulnerabilityprimary health carereviewvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID34654333
PMCPMC8521415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.