Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34654279›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2018

Medical student attitudes and concepts of frailty and delirium.

Danielle Nimmons, T Pattison, P O'Neill

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle NimmonsPennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Rochdale Old Road, Bury, BL9 7TD, UK. d.nimmons@doctors.org.uk.
T PattisonUniversity of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
P O'NeillUniversity of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBPennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrailty and delirium are important conditions in an ageing population, but there is little evidence exploring medical students' conceptualisation of, or attitudes towards these subjects. We investigated how students' concepts of frailty and delirium changed following a new geriatric medicine module at Manchester medical school. MATERIALS AND

methodsSemi-structured interviews were used with students before and after the new teaching week to explore changes in attitude towards frailty and delirium and their conceptualisation. Final year students who had not completed the module were interviewed as a comparison group. Grounded theory and content clouds were employed for data analysis.

resultsTen 4th year and 11 final year students were interviewed. After the teaching week, 4th year students had a richer conceptualisation of frailty and delirium. Students described structured assessments such as comprehensive geriatric assessment and expressed confidence in their use. Their frameworks were more developed than the final year students who had not had such teaching. Attitudes towards older people, frailty, delirium, and the specialty of geriatric medicine improved following the teaching week.

conclusionThis study shows that geriatric medicine teaching improves students' conceptualisation of frailty and delirium and their understanding of the importance of structured assessments and management plans.

Indexed as

DeliriumFrailtyUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID34654279
OpenAlexW2776572878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.