ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2018
Association of orthogeriatric services with long-term mortality in patients with hip fracture.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis.BMJ open quality · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of Orthogeriatric Care Models on Outcomes of Hip Fracture Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Calcified tissue international · 2022Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the impact of the comprehensive orthogeriatric care model (OGM) on 2-year survival, length of stay (LOS), discharges to nursing homes, and antiosteoporotic treatment (AOT) in patients with hip fracture.
methodsRetrospective cohort study. Hospitals were classified as OGM if the patient was cared for in a comprehensive orthogeriatric unit. We included data from patients ≥ 65 years old discharged between 2012 and 2013. The main outcome was 12- and 24-month mortality. The variables collected were sex, type of fracture, comorbidities, AOT, LOS, and discharge to nursing homes. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier method and comparison with Mantel-Haenszel test. Factors associated with death were determined by logistic regression.
resultsFirst admissions in the 12 (out of 32) hospitals with OGM were 3580 of 9215 (38.8%). Patients in OGM had more comorbidities and discharges to nursing homes, shorter LOS, and less prescription of AOT. Two years after the admission the deceased patients were 3000 (32.6%). The survival was lower in males (p < 0.001), in the older age groups (p < 0.001), and in patients with Charlson > 1 (p < 0.001). Factors associated with increased risk of death at 12 and 24 months (logistic regression) were male gender, age and Charlson > 1, while care in the OGM decreased the risk. OGM benefited more patients > 80 years and those with Charlson < 1.
conclusionsPatients admitted in OGM have shorter stays, more discharges to nursing homes, lower prescription of AOT, and better 12- and 24-month survival adjusted by sex, age, and comorbidities compared to non-OGM care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.