ArticleBlood advances2022
Iron status influences the response of cord blood megakaryocyte progenitors to eltrombopag in vitro.
Article in Blood advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Clinical Impact of Eltrombopag-Associated Iron Chelation in Adults with Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Multicenter Real-World Study.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Dose-dependent effects of eltrombopag iron chelation on platelet formation.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenia, including secondary forms, and selection of second-line treatment.Haematologica · 2022Article
- The mutual crosstalk between iron and erythropoiesis.International journal of hematology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Eltrombopag (ELT) is a thrombopoietic agent approved for immune thrombocytopenia and also a potent iron chelator. Here we found that ELT exhibited dose-dependent opposing effects on in vitro megakaryopoiesis: low concentrations (≤6 µM, ELT6) stimulated megakaryopoiesis, but high concentrations (30 µM, ELT30) suppressed megakaryocyte (MK) differentiation and proliferation. The suppressive effects of ELT30 were reproduced by other iron chelators, supporting iron chelation as a likely mechanism. During MK differentiation, committed MK progenitors (CD34+/CD41+ and CD34-/CD41+ cells) were significantly more sensitive than undifferentiated progenitors (CD34+/CD41- cells) to the suppressive effects of ELT30, which resulted from both decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis. The antiproliferative effects of ELT30 were reversed by increased iron in the culture, as were the proapoptotic effects when exposure to ELT30 was short. Because committed MK progenitors exhibited the highest proliferative rate and the highest sensitivity to iron chelation, we tested whether their iron status influenced their response to ELT during rapid cell expansion. In these studies, iron deficiency reduced the proliferation of CD41+ cells in response to all ELT concentrations. Severe iron deficiency also reduced the number of MKs generated in response to high thrombopoietin concentrations by ∼50%, compared with iron-replete cultures. Our findings support the hypothesis that although iron deficiency can stimulate certain cells and steps in megakaryopoiesis, it can also limit the proliferation of committed MK progenitors, with severity of iron deficiency and degree of thrombopoietic stimulation influencing the ultimate output. Further studies are needed to clarify how megakaryopoiesis, iron deficiency, and ELT stimulation are clinically interrelated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.