SynthesisBlood advances2022
Surgical management of patients with von Willebrand disease: summary of 2 systematic reviews of the literature.
Synthesis in Blood advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plasma-Derived von Willebrand Factor/Factor VIII Concentrate (Haemate P) in von Willebrand Disease: A Systematic Review and Pharmacovigilance Update.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025Pooled it
- Vonicog Alfa versus Plasma-Derived von Willebrand Factor during Hospitalization: Results of an Observational Retrospective Multicenter Study.Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis · 2026Observational
- Von Willebrand disease: A century of progress.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Treatment of von Willebrand disease.Blood advances · 2026Review
- Gynecologic and obstetric management of girls and women with von Willebrand disease.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Historical, current and future treatments for von Willebrand disease.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement: a narrative review of best practices for perioperative management of patients with bleeding disorders.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Review
- Global estimation of the bleeding episodes treatable with desmopressin in von Willebrand disease and hemophilia A.Haematologica · 2025Review
- 2025 ASH ISTH NBDF WFH monitoring report on the 2021 clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease.Blood advances · 2025Review
- Normal Haemostasis, Inherited Bleeding Disorders and Surgery: What Does the Anaesthesiologist Need to Know?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Article
- Perioperative Outcomes of Patients with Bleeding Disorders Undergoing Major Surgery at an Academic Hemophilia Treatment Center.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 19 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. The management of patients with VWD who are undergoing surgeries is crucial to prevent bleeding complications. We systematically summarized the evidence on the management of patients with VWD who are undergoing major and minor surgeries to support the development of practice guidelines. We searched Medline and EMBASE from inception through October 2019 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs), comparative observational studies, and case series that compared maintaining factor VIII (FVIII) levels or von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels at >0.50 IU/mL for at least 3 days in patients undergoing major surgery, and those with options for perioperative management of patients undergoing minor surgery. Two authors screened and abstracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We conducted meta-analyses when possible. We evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. We included 7 case series for major surgeries and 2 RCTs and 12 case series for minor surgeries. Very-low-certainty evidence showed that maintaining FVIII levels or VWF levels of >0.50 IU/mL for at least 3 consecutive days showed excellent hemostatic efficacy (as labeled by the researchers) after 74% to 100% of major surgeries. Low- to very-low-certainty evidence showed that prescribing tranexamic acid and increasing VWF levels to 0.50 IU/mL resulted in fewer bleeding complications after minor procedures compared with increasing VWF levels to 0.50 IU/mL alone. Given the low-quality evidence for guiding management decisions, a shared-decision model leading to individualized therapy plans will be important in patients with VWD who are undergoing surgical and invasive procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.