SynthesisNeuroImage. Clinical2021
Imaging cortical multiple sclerosis lesions with ultra-high field MRI.
Synthesis in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms of transcranial magnetic brain stimulation.Physiological reviews · 2026Review
- A comparative study of deep learning for cortical lesion MRI segmentation with explainability analysis in multiple sclerosis.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Spinal cord versus brain imaging biomarkers of multiple sclerosis trajectory combining 7T and 3T MRI.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Delayed transcallosal conduction to the lesioned sensorimotor cortex in multiple Sclerosis: A combined TMS 7 T-MRI study.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Demyelinated lesion associated compartmental inflammation in progressive multiple sclerosis brains.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
- 7 Tesla MRI in Multiple Sclerosis: Insights From Its Use in Clinical Routine.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Benchmarking and Explaining Deep Learning Cortical Lesion MRI Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Evolution of Cortical Lesions and Function-Specific Cognitive Decline in People With Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology · 2025Article
- Explaining Uncertainty in Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation Beyond Prediction Errors.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Subcortical plaques and inflammation reflect cortical and meningeal pathologies in progressive multiple sclerosis.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Brain lesion characteristics in Chinese multiple sclerosis patients: A 7-T MRI cohort study.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Article
- Assessment of the available evidence for the use of 7-Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in neurological and musculoskeletal disorders, with comparison to 3-T and 1.5-T MRI: A systematic scoping review.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Biomarker combinations from different modalities predict early disability accumulation in multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Current and future role of MRI in the diagnosis and prognosis of multiple sclerosis.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Review
- Decoding Gray Matter Involvement in Multiple Sclerosis via Imaging.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2024Review
- Association of Cortical Lesions With Regional Glutamate, GABA,Neurology · 2024Article
- Cortical matrix remodeling as a hallmark of relapsing-remitting neuroinflammation in MR elastography and quantitative MRI.Acta neuropathologica · 2024Article
- Linking lesions in sensorimotor cortex to contralateral hand function in multiple sclerosis: a 7 T MRI study.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCortical lesions are abundant in multiple sclerosis (MS), yet difficult to visualize in vivo. Ultra-high field (UHF) MRI at 7 T and above provides technological advances suited to optimize the detection of cortical lesions in MS. PURPOSE: To provide a narrative and quantitative systematic review of the literature on UHF MRI of cortical lesions in MS.
methodsA systematic search of all literature on UHF MRI of cortical lesions in MS published before September 2020. Quantitative outcome measures included cortical lesion numbers reported using 3 T and 7 T MRI and between 7 T MRI sequences, along with sensitivity of UHF MRI towards cortical lesions verified by histopathology.
results7 T MRI detected on average 52 ± 26% (mean ± 95% confidence interval) more cortical lesions than the best performing image contrast at 3 T, with the largest increase in type II-IV intracortical lesion detection. Across all studies, the mean cortical lesion number was 17 ± 6 per patient. In progressive MS cohorts, approximately four times more cortical lesions were reported than in CIS/early RRMS, and RRMS. Yet, there was no difference in lesion type ratio between these MS subtypes. Furthermore, superiority of one MRI sequence over another could not be established from available data. Post-mortem lesion detection with UHF MRI agreed only modestly with pathological examinations. Mean pro- and retrospective sensitivity was 33 ± 6% and 71 ± 10%, respectively, with the highest sensitivity towards type I and type IV lesions.
conclusionUHF MRI improves cortical lesion detection in MS considerably compared to 3 T MRI, particularly for type II-IV lesions. Despite modest sensitivity, 7 T MRI is still capable of visualizing all aspects of cortical lesion pathology and could potentially aid clinicians in diagnosing and monitoring MS, and progressive MS in particular. However, standardization of acquisition and segmentation protocols is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.