Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34653519›Full record

ReviewExperimental eye research2021

Evidence of regional specializations in regenerated zebrafish retina.

Deborah L Stenkamp, Derek D Viall, Diana M Mitchell

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental eye research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deborah L StenkampDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 82844, USA. Electronic address: dstenkam@uidaho.edu.
Derek D ViallDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 82844, USA.
Diana M MitchellDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 82844, USA.
University of Idaho · US

Funding

Women's health: interplay of maternal diet and key demographics on neurological health in the rural frontier and remote WestP20GM103408 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI Carolyn Hovde Bohach · 2012 to 2026
$59.8M
Patterning Genes in Retinal DevelopmentR01EY012146 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI Deborah L Stenkamp · 2004 to 2026
$6.7M
Acquisition of a Dynamic Imaging SystemS10OD018044 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI STENKAMP, DEBORAH L · 2014 to 2014
$455k
Synapses in Regenerated RetinaR21EY026814 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI STENKAMP, DEBORAH L · 2016 to 2017
$388k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012146NEI NIH HHS R21 EY026814NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103408NIH HHS S10 OD018044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult zebrafish are capable of functional retinal regeneration following damage. A goal of vision science is to stimulate or permit a similar process in mammals to treat human retinal disease and trauma. Ideally such a process would reconstitute the stereotyped, two-dimensional topographic patterns and regional specializations of specific cell types, functionally important for representation of the visual field. An example in humans is the cone-rich fovea, essential for high-acuity color vision. Stereotyped, global topographic patterns of specific retinal cell types are also found in zebrafish, particularly for cone types expressing the tandemly-replicated lws (long wavelength-sensitive) and rh2 (middle wavelength-sensitive) opsins. Here we examine whether regionally specialized patterns of LWS1 and LWS2 cones are restored in regenerated retinas in zebrafish. Adult transgenic zebrafish carrying fluorescent reporters for lws1 and lws2 were subjected to retinal lesions that destroy all neurons but spare glia, via intraocular injection of the neurotoxin ouabain. Regenerated and contralateral control retinas were mounted whole or sectioned, and imaged. Overall spatial patterns of lws1 vs. lws2 opsin-expressing cones in regenerated retinas were remarkably similar to those of control retinas, with LWS1 cones in ventral/peripheral regions, and LWS2 cones in dorsal/central regions. However, LWS2 cones occupied a smaller fraction of regenerated retina, and several cones co-expressed the lws1 and lws2 reporters in regenerated retinas. Local patterns of regenerated LWS1 cones showed modest reductions in regularity. These results suggest that some of the regional patterning information, or the source of such signals, for LWS cone subtypes may be retained by undamaged cell types (Müller glia or RPE) and re-deployed during regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedModels, AnimalRegenerationRetinaZebrafishConeDevelopmentPatternRegenerationRegional specializationRetinaZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID34653519
PMCPMC8608723
OpenAlexW3205367551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.