Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34652949›Full record

ArticleScience advances2021

Accelerated discovery of 3D printing materials using data-driven multiobjective optimization.

Timothy Erps, Michael Foshey, Mina Konaković Luković, Wan Shou, Hanns Hagen Goetzke, Herve Dietsch, Klaus Stoll, Bernhard von Vacano, Wojciech Matusik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Machine-Guided Discovery of Acrylate Photopolymer Compositions.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Timothy ErpsComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL), Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6085-7469
Michael FosheyComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL), Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9047-8387
Mina Konaković LukovićComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL), Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Wan ShouComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL), Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7911-8778
Hanns Hagen GoetzkeBASF SE, Advanced Materials and Systems Research, Carl Bosch Str 38, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9204-278X
Herve DietschBASF SE, Advanced Materials and Systems Research, Carl Bosch Str 38, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Klaus StollBASF SE, Advanced Materials and Systems Research, Carl Bosch Str 38, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Bernhard von VacanoBASF SE, Advanced Materials and Systems Research, Carl Bosch Str 38, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4185-1154
Wojciech MatusikComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL), Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0212-5643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing has become one of the forefront technologies in fabrication, enabling products impossible to manufacture before. Although many materials exist for additive manufacturing, most suffer from performance trade-offs. Current materials are designed with inefficient human-driven intuition-based methods, leaving them short of optimal solutions. We propose a machine learning approach to accelerating the discovery of additive manufacturing materials with optimal trade-offs in mechanical performance. A multiobjective optimization algorithm automatically guides the experimental design by proposing how to mix primary formulations to create better performing materials. The algorithm is coupled with a semiautonomous fabrication platform to substantially reduce the number of performed experiments and overall time to solution. Without prior knowledge of the primary formulations, the proposed methodology autonomously uncovers 12 optimal formulations and enlarges the discovered performance space 288 times after only 30 experimental iterations. This methodology could be easily generalized to other material design systems and enable automated discovery.

Identifiers

PMID34652949
PMCPMC8519564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.