Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34652877›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology2021

Active learning tools improve the learning outcomes, scientific attitude, and critical thinking in higher education: Experiences in an online course during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Izadora Volpato Rossi, Jordana Dinorá de Lima, Bruna Sabatke, Maria Alice Ferreira Nunes, Graciela Evans Ramirez, Marcel Ivan Ramirez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Biochemistry Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review on Methodologies and Teaching Resources.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Editorial: Education and Training in Biomedical Science.British journal of biomedical science · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Izadora Volpato RossiPostgraduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5495-8167
Jordana Dinorá de LimaPostgraduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil, Brazil.
Bruna SabatkePostgraduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6321-6656
Maria Alice Ferreira NunesPostgraduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil, Brazil.
Graciela Evans RamirezTechnological Professional Education Sector, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Marcel Ivan RamirezEVAHPI - Extracellular Vesicles and Host-Parasite Interactions Research Group Laboratório de Biologia Molecular e Sistemática de Tripanossomatideos, Carlos Chagas Institute-Fiocruz, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6917-1954

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active teaching methodologies have been placed as a hope for changing education at different levels, transiting from passive lecture-centered to student-centered learning. With the health measures of social distance, the COVID-19 pandemic forced a strong shift to remote education. With the challenge of delivering quality education through a computer screen, we validated and applied an online course model using active teaching tools for higher education. We incorporated published active-learning strategies into an online construct, with problem-based inquiry and design of inquiry research projects to serve as our core active learning tool. The gains related to students' science learning experiences and their attitudes toward science were assessed by applying questionnaires before, during, and after the course. The course counted on the participation of 83 students, most of them (60.8%) from postgraduate students. Our results show that engagement provided by active learning methods can improve performance both in hard and soft skills. Students' participation seems to be more relevant when activities require the interaction of information, prediction, and reasoning, such as open-ended questions and design of research projects. Therefore, our data show that, in pandemic, active learning tools benefit students and improve their critical thinking and their motivation and positive positioning in science.

Indexed as

AttitudePandemicsThinkingCOVID-19Education, DistanceHumansSARS-CoV-2Students, Medicalactive learningbiology courseCOVID-19 pandemiccritical thinkinge-learninghigher education

Identifiers

PMID34652877
PMCPMC8653153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.