ArticleMedical education2022
Delineating the field of medical education: Bibliometric research approach(es).
Article in Medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- A bibliometric analysis of research on the learning environment in medical schools: trends, gaps, and global perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Assessment and Feedback in Medical Education: Bibliometric Mapping Study and Thematic Evidence Map.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Knowledge Syntheses in Medical Education.Family medicine · 2026Review
- The Presence and Nature of AI-Use Disclosure Statements in Medical Education Journals: A Bibliometric Study.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- How AI Is Transforming Medical Education: Bibliometric Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- A State-of-the-Art Review of the Historical Evolution of the Graduate Medical Educator Role.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2025Review
- China's national continuing medical education program for general practitioners: a cross-sectional survey (2016-2023).BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Two Decades of Medical Education Scholarship: Mapping Collaboration and Thematic Shifts Using Web of Science (2000-2019).Perspectives on medical education · 2025Article
- Mapping the knowledge network of extracellular vesicles and angiogenesis in tumor-immune communication: a scientometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Black Women in Medical Education Publishing: Bibliometric and Testimonio Accounts Using Intersectionality Methodology.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- The Blurred Thresholds of AI-Use Disclosure: Health Professions Education Journal Editors' Expectations of Necessity and Sufficiency.Perspectives on medical education · 2025Article
- "The Best Home for This Paper": A Qualitative Study of How Authors Select Where to Submit Manuscripts.Perspectives on medical education · 2024Article
- Time to Publication in Medical Education Journals: An Analysis of Publication Timelines During COVID-19 (2019-2022).Perspectives on medical education · 2024Article
- Analyzing the Evolution of Medical Ethics Education: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Articles.Cureus · 2023Review
- Faster, higher, stronger - together? A bibliometric analysis of author distribution in top medical education journals.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- The voices of medical education scholarship: Describing the published landscape.Medical education · 2023Article
- Expanding Interdisciplinarity: A Bibliometric Study of Medical Education Using the Medical Education Journal List-24 (MEJ-24).Perspectives on medical education · 2023Article
- "Can you recommend a journal for my paper?"Perspectives on medical education · 2022Article
- Delineating the field of medical education: Bibliometric research approach(es).Medical education · 2022Article
- Traditional Chinese Exercise for Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis With Future Directions.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe field of medical education remains poorly delineated such that there is no broad consensus of articles or journals that comprise 'the field'. This lack of consensus indicates a missed opportunity for researchers to generate insights about the field that could facilitate conducting bibliometric studies and other research designs (e.g., systematic reviews) and also enable individuals to identify themselves as 'medical education researchers'. Other fields have utilised bibliometric field delineation, which is the assigning of articles or journals to a certain field in an effort to define that field. PROCESS: In this Research Approach, three bibliometric field delineation approaches-information retrieval, core journals, and journal co-citation-are introduced. For each approach, the authors describe attempts to apply it in medical education and identify related strengths and weaknesses. Based on co-citation, the authors propose the Medical Education Journal List 24 (MEJ-24), as a starting point for delineating medical education and invite the community to collaborate on improving and potentially expanding this list. PEARLS: As a research approach, field delineation is complicated, and there is no clear best way to delineate the field of medical education. However, recent advances in information science provide potentially fruitful approaches to deal with the field's complexity. When considering these approaches, researchers should consider collaborating with bibliometricians. Bibliometric approaches rely on available metadata for articles and journals, which necessitates that researchers examine the metadata prior to analysis to understand its strengths and weaknesses, and to assess how this might affect data interpretation. While using bibliometric approaches for field delineation is valuable, it is important to remember that these techniques are only as good as the research team's interpretation of the data, which suggests that an expanded approach is needed to better delineate medical education, an approach that includes active discussion within the medical education community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.