Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34652611›Full record

ArticlePsychometrika2022

Bayesian Mixture Model of Extended Redundancy Analysis.

Minjung Kyung, Ju-Hyun Park, Ji Yeh Choi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychometrika, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Minjung KyungDepartment of Statistics, Duksung Women's University, 33 Samyang-ro, 144-gil, Dobong-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ju-Hyun ParkDepartment of Statistics, Dongguk University, 26 Phil-dong 3ga, Jung-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Yeh ChoiDepartment of Psychology, York University, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, ON, Canada. jychoi@yorku.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0134-9963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extended redundancy analysis (ERA), a generalized version of redundancy analysis (RA), has been proposed as a useful method for examining interrelationships among multiple sets of variables in multivariate linear regression models. As a limitation of the extant RA or ERA analyses, however, parameters are estimated by aggregating data across all observations even in a case where the study population could consist of several heterogeneous subpopulations. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian mixture extension of ERA to obtain both probabilistic classification of observations into a number of subpopulations and estimation of ERA models within each subpopulation. It specifically estimates the posterior probabilities of observations belonging to different subpopulations, subpopulation-specific residual covariance structures, component weights and regression coefficients in a unified manner. We conduct a simulation study to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method in terms of recovering parameters correctly. We also apply the approach to real data to demonstrate its empirical usefulness.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansLinear ModelsPsychometricsBayesianclusteringextended redundancy analysisfinite mixture model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.