Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34652526›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Magnetic resonance angiographic study of variations in course of paraclival and parasellar internal carotid artery in relation to expanded endonasal endoscopic approaches.

Narayan Jayashankar, Hruchali Patangrao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Narayan JayashankarDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Nanavati Superspeciality Hospital, Mumbai, India. drnarayanj@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6804-2993
Hruchali PatangraoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Nanavati Superspeciality Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo study the variations in the course of the paraclival and parasellar carotid arteries in normal subjects using magnetic resonance angiography as is relevant from an endoscopic endonasal perspective.

methodsTwo hundred MR angiographies of normal subjects were analyzed in a prospective study. The intercarotid distances were measured at fixed points along the paraclival and parasellar segments of the internal carotid artery. The intercarotid spaces thus obtained were categorized into trapezoid, square and hourglass shapes. The angle between the posterior ascending vertical and horizontal bend of the parasellar ICA was also measured and analyzed.

resultsThe trapezoid shape of intercarotid space is the most common (52.5%), followed by the square (35%) and the hourglass (12.5%) shaped spaces. Angle of < 80° between the posterior ascending vertical and horizontal bend of the parasellar ICA was found in 39% of subjects, angle between 80° and 100° was found in 9% subjects, angle > 100° was found in 43% while asymmetric angles on the two sides was found in 9% of subjects.

conclusionA thorough understanding of the course of the ICA is important in planning the approach and preventing injury to the ICA.

Indexed as

Carotid Artery, InternalMagnetic Resonance AngiographyHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyNoseProspective StudiesInternal carotid arteryParaclival ICAParasellar ICA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.