Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34652518›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2022

Distribution of electric field in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder treated with deep brain stimulation of the bed nucleus of stria terminalis.

Matilda Naesström, Johannes Johansson, Marwan Hariz, Owe Bodlund, Karin Wårdell, Patric Blomstedt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Incidental resolution of pedophilia in a patient undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): a case report and long-term follow-up.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matilda NaesströmDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Sciences, Umeå University, 90187, Umeå, Sweden. matilda.naesstrom@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9679-1609
Johannes JohanssonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Marwan HarizUnit of Deep Brain Stimulation, Department of Clinical Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Owe BodlundDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Sciences, Umeå University, 90187, Umeå, Sweden.
Karin WårdellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Patric BlomstedtUnit of Deep Brain Stimulation, Department of Clinical Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is being investigated as a treatment for therapy-refractory obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). Many different brain targets are being trialled. Several of these targets such as the ventral striatum (including the nucleus accumbens (NAc)), the ventral capsule, the inferior thalamic peduncle, and the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST)) belong to the same network, are anatomically very close to one another, or even overlap. Data is still missing on how various stimulation parameters in a given target will affect surrounding anatomical areas and impact the clinical outcome of DBS.

methodsIn a pilot study of eleven participants with DBS of the BNST, we investigate through patient-specific simulation of electric field, which anatomical areas are affected by the electric field, and if this can be related to the clinical results. Our study combined individual patient's stimulation parameters at 12- and 24-month follow-up with image data from the preoperative MRI and postoperative CT. These data were used to calculate the distribution of electric field and create individual anatomical models of the field of stimulation.

resultsThe individual electric stimulation fields by stimulation in the BNST were similar at both the 12- and 24-month follow-up, involving mainly anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC), genu of the internal capsule (IC), BNST, fornix, anteromedial globus pallidus externa (GPe), and the anterior commissure. A statistical significant correlation (p < 0.05) between clinical effect measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale and stimulation was found at the 12-month follow-up in the ventral ALIC and anteromedial GPe.

conclusionsMany of the targets under investigation for OCD are in anatomical proximity. As seen in our study, off-target effects are overlapping. Therefore, DBS in the region of ALIC, NAc, and BNST may perhaps be considered to be stimulation of the same target.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationObsessive-Compulsive DisorderSeptal NucleiHumansInternal CapsulePilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeBed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST)Deep brain stimulation (DBS)Electric fieldObsessive compulsive disorder (OCD)Simulation

Identifiers

PMID34652518
PMCPMC8761125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.