ReviewDer Nervenarzt2022
[Intracerebral hemorrhage under platelet inhibition and oral anticoagulation in patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Analysis of the prevalence of anticoagulant therapy in patients with cognitive disorders and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA)].Der Nervenarzt · 2024Article
- Posterior confluent white matter hyperintensities and intracerebral hemorrhage recurrence risk in patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral anticoagulation in patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy is a therapeutic challenge. The association of cerebral amyloid angiopathy with intracerebral hemorrhage, a high mortality of intracerebral hemorrhage especially under oral anticoagulation and the high risk of recurrent bleeding require a multidisciplinary approach and a thorough risk-benefit analysis. Vitamin K antagonists increase the risk of intracerebral bleeding and the accompanying mortality by 60% and should be avoided if possible or reserved for special clinical situations (e.g. mechanical aortic valve replacement). Treatment with novel oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs also increases the risk of cerebral bleeding and therefore needs a thorough risk-benefit evaluation. An interventional left atrial appendage closure is a promising therapeutic option especially in patients with an absolute arrythmia with atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, other clinical implications in patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy are the subject of this review of the literature, such as special characteristics after acute ischemic stroke and the necessary secondary prophylaxis, with previous intracerebral hemorrhage and in patients with cognitive deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.