ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2021
[Transurethral resection of the urinary bladder : Status quo and outlook on new developments].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Blue versus white light for transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (Review)].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransurethral resection of the urinary bladder (TURB) is the standard intervention in the diagnostic workup and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. In order to minimize cancer recurrence and potential complications, continuous technical development of TURB is of high clinical interest.
objectivesPresentation of the current standards and discussion of technological changes. MATERIALS AND
methodsAnalysis of the current guideline recommendations and literature research.
resultsThe limitations of classic monopolar TURB is supplemented by new resection methods (en bloc) and technologies (bipolar and laser resection). Along with improved visualization through partially established technologies of photodynamic and digital image enhancement, there is potential for optimization regarding the likelihood of recurrences and complications as well as the histological quality of the resected material.
conclusionA positive impact on the oncological value and safety of TURB seems possible through the use of modern technologies. Further establishment up to evidence-based guideline recommendations are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.