ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2021
[Assessment and operationalization of the characteristic "gender" in representative population-based surveys: challenges and implications with the example of the GeSiD study].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patterns of Sexual Risk Behaviors and Sexuality-Related Risk Factors among Young Adults in Germany: Implications for Prevention and Therapy.Archives of sexual behavior · 2024Article
- Public attitudes towards sexual behavior-Results of the German Health and Sexuality Survey (GeSiD).PloS one · 2023Article
- Study protocol: Hypersexual and hyposexual behavior among adults diagnosed with alcohol- and substance use disorders-Associations between traumatic experiences and problematic sexual behavior.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Factors associated with non-use of condoms among heterosexually-active single people in Germany: Results from the first representative, population-based German health and sexuality survey (GeSiD).International journal of STD & AIDS · 2022Article
- Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study - objectives, procedure and experiences.Journal of health monitoring · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Representative quantitative surveys assess the participants' gender in order to allow for gender specific analyses of the research questions and to draw conclusions about the populations. This is important in order to develop information and interventions tailored to the target groups. However, although gender is no longer considered exclusively as a binary construct, it is still often surveyed through a binary variable with the response options woman/man or female/male. In this article, we discuss why this approach is outdated or incomplete and why a move away from this approach is important and necessary. Using the GeSiD study on "Health and Sexuality in Germany" as an example, in this discussion post we demonstrate how gender can be assessed by means of a two-step model in which the first step assesses gender assigned at birth and the second step the subjective gender affiliation. At the same time, we discuss the challenges that this approach brings along. We place the results of the GeSiD study into a larger context and discuss the implications and possibilities for operationalizing gender in representative surveys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.