Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34652286›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2022

Unhelpful Thoughts and Distress Regarding Symptoms Limit Accommodation of Musculoskeletal Pain.

Teun Teunis, Aresh Al Salman, Karl Koenig, David Ring, Amirreza Fatehi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07602725 (Patient Experience and Trust When Viewing Original Medical Notes Versus Large Language Model), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07602725 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Patient Experience and Trust When Viewing Original Medical Notes Versus Large Language Model (LLM)-Generated Plain Language Summaries

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas at AustinRan2026 to 2027Enrolled135ConditionsMusculoskeletal Disease, Orthopedic PatientsArmsLLM-Generated Medical Note, Control (Original Medical Note)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Editorial: The Goal is Health, Not Surgery.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Teun TeunisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-5660-0695
Aresh Al SalmanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Dell Medical School, the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Karl KoenigDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Dell Medical School, the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
David RingDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Dell Medical School, the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Amirreza FatehiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Dell Medical School, the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
The University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong people with musculoskeletal disorders, much of the variation in magnitude of incapability and pain intensity is accounted for by mental and social health opportunities rather than severity of pathology. Current questionnaires seem to combine distinct aspects of mental health such as unhelpful thoughts and distress regarding symptoms, and they can be long and burdensome. To identify personalized health strategies, it would be helpful to measure unhelpful thoughts and distress regarding symptoms at the point of care with just a few questions in a way that feels relevant to a person's health. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do questions that address unhelpful thoughts and distress regarding symptoms independently account for variation in accommodation of pain? (2) Which questions best measure unhelpful thoughts and distress regarding symptoms?

methodsThis is a cross-sectional questionnaire study of people seeking care regarding upper and lower extremity conditions from one of eight specialist clinicians (one upper extremity, one arthroplasty, and one sports surgeon and their three nurse practitioners and two physician assistants) in one urban office. Between June 2020 and September 2020, 171 new and returning patients were approached and agreed to participate, and 89% (153) of patients completed all questionnaires. The most common reason for noncompletion was the use of a pandemic strategy allowing people to use their phone to finish the questionnaire, with more people leaving before completion. Women and divorced, separated, or widowed people were more likely to not complete the survey, and we specifically account for sex and marital status as potential confounders in our multivariable analysis. Forty-eight percent (73 of 153) of participants were women, with a mean age 48 ± 16 years. Participants completed demographics and the validated questionnaires: Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Negative Pain Thoughts Questionnaire, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale, and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (a measure of accommodation to pain). In an exploratory factor analysis, we found that questions group together on four topics: (1) distress about symptoms (unhelpful feelings of worry and despair), (2) unhelpful thoughts about symptoms (such as worst-case thinking and pain indicating harm), (3) being able to plan, and (4) discomfort with uncertainty. We used a multivariable analysis, accounting for potential confounding demographics, to determine whether the identified question groupings account for variation in accommodation of pain-and thus are clinically relevant. Then, we used a confirmatory factor analysis to determine which questions best represent clinically relevant groupings of questions.

resultsAfter accounting for sex, marital status, work, and income, we found that distress and unhelpful thoughts about symptoms were independently associated with accommodation of pain, and together, they explained 60% of its variation (compared with 52% for distress alone and 40% for unhelpful thoughts alone). Variation in symptoms of distress was best measured by the question "I feel I can't stand it anymore" (76%). Variation in unhelpful thoughts was best addressed by the question "I wouldn't have this much pain if there wasn't something potentially dangerous going on in my body" (64%).

conclusionWe found that distress (unhelpful feelings) and unhelpful thoughts about symptoms are separate factors with important and comparable associations with accommodation to pain. It also appears that these two factors can be measured with just a few questions. Being attentive to the language people use and the language of influential questions might improve clinician identification of mental health opportunities in the form of distress and unhelpful thoughts about symptoms, which in turn might contribute to better accommodation and alleviation of symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPain MeasurementPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal Pain

Identifiers

PMID34652286
PMCPMC8747479
OpenAlexW3206500396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.