Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34651173›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2021

Building the mega single-cell transcriptome ocular meta-atlas.

Vinay S Swamy, Temesgen D Fufa, Robert B Hufnagel, David M McGaughey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Whole-Genome Landscape of Retinal Hemangioblastomas.Translational vision science & technology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Integrating single-cell RNA-seq datasets with substantial batch effects.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vinay S SwamyBioinformatics Group, Ophthalmic Genetics & Visual Function Branch, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 20892, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Temesgen D FufaMedical Genetics and Ophthalmic Genomics Unit, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 20892, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8298-0051
Robert B HufnagelMedical Genetics and Ophthalmic Genomics Unit, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 20892, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
David M McGaugheyBioinformatics Group, Ophthalmic Genetics & Visual Function Branch, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 20892, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9224-2888

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of highly scalable single-cell transcriptome technology has resulted in the creation of thousands of datasets, >30 in the retina alone. Analyzing the transcriptomes between different projects is highly desirable because this would allow for better assessment of which biological effects are consistent across independent studies. However it is difficult to compare and contrast data across different projects because there are substantial batch effects from computational processing, single-cell technology utilized, and the natural biological variation. While many single-cell transcriptome-specific batch correction methods purport to remove the technical noise, it is difficult to ascertain which method functions best.

resultsWe developed a lightweight R package (scPOP, single-cell Pick Optimal Parameters) that brings in batch integration methods and uses a simple heuristic to balance batch merging and cell type/cluster purity. We use this package along with a Snakefile-based workflow system to demonstrate how to optimally merge 766,615 cells from 33 retina datsets and 3 species to create a massive ocular single-cell transcriptome meta-atlas.

conclusionsThis provides a model for how to efficiently create meta-atlases for tissues and cells of interest.

Indexed as

Transcriptome

Identifiers

PMID34651173
PMCPMC8514335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.