ArticleCritical care explorations2021
Biplane Imaging Versus Standard Transverse Single-Plane Imaging for Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Access: A Prospective Controlled Crossover Trial.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05119673 (Point-of-care Ultrasound for Difficult Peripheral Vascular Access in the Emergency Department - a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Point-of-care Ultrasound for Difficult Peripheral Vascular Access in the Emergency Department - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-plane versus real-time biplane approaches for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in critical care patients: a randomized controlled trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Internal jugular access using pocket ultrasound in a simulated model: comparison between biplane and monoplane visualization techniques.The ultrasound journal · 2023Article
- High-Volume-Rate 3-D Ultrasound Imaging Using Fast-Tilting and Redirecting Reflectors.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023Article
- Evidence and Practicality of Real-Time Ultrasound-Guided Procedures in the Intensive Care Unit: A New Skill Set for the Intensivist.Texas Heart Institute journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obtaining peripheral IV access in critically ill patients is often challenging especially for novice providers. The availability of biplane imaging for ultrasound guided peripheral access has the potential to improve successful venous cannulation compared with standard plane imaging.
designSingle-center quasi-randomized (alternate allocation) crossover trial.
settingSurgical ICU at the Massachusetts General Hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty surgical ICU nurses with no prior experience using ultrasound for peripheral IV were enrolled.
interventionsAll participants viewed instructional videos on single-plane and biplane imaging for peripheral IV insertion. The participants were then quasi-randomly assigned to use either single-plane or biplane imaging for peripheral IV insertion using a phantom model. The time to catheter completion, successful lumen cannulation, and attempts in which the needle was observed to go through the back wall of the vessel were recorded for each of the three attempts. The following day the participants repeated the peripheral IV insertion with the alternate imaging modality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsBiplane imaging compared with single-plane imaging was associated with a significantly greater overall success rate (78.3% ± 22.4% vs 41.7% ± 26%;
conclusionsThis proof-of-principle study demonstrates that the biplane ultrasound imaging approach for vessel cannulation resulted in an overall faster, more successful, and safer peripheral IV access than the standard single-plane transverse approach when performed by novice ultrasound users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.