Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34651126›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2021

Neurological complications induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: a comprehensive descriptive case-series unravelling high risk of long-term sequelae.

Léo Plaçais, Jean-Marie Michot, Stéphane Champiat, Patricia Romano-Martin, Capucine Baldini, Maria Silva Joao, Aurélien Marabelle, Anne-Laure Voisin, Adeline Not, Céline Labeyrie and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Development of an eHealth-enhanced model of care for the monitoring and management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Neurotoxicity and safety of the rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a growing issue in neuro-oncology practice.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Léo PlaçaisDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Saclay, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94270, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7345-9478
Jean-Marie MichotDépartement d'Innovation Thérapeutique et des Essais Précoces, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Stéphane ChampiatDépartement d'Innovation Thérapeutique et des Essais Précoces, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Patricia Romano-MartinDépartement d'Innovation Thérapeutique et des Essais Précoces, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Capucine BaldiniDépartement d'Innovation Thérapeutique et des Essais Précoces, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Maria Silva JoaoDépartement d'Innovation Thérapeutique et des Essais Précoces, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7416-1566
Aurélien MarabelleDépartement d'Innovation Thérapeutique et des Essais Précoces, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Anne-Laure VoisinDépartement d'Innovation Thérapeutique et des Essais Précoces, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Adeline NotNeurology Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Saclay, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94270, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5868-7149
Céline LabeyrieNeurology Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Saclay, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94270, France.
Guillemette BeaudonnetNeurophysiology Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Saclay, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94270, France.
Ariane LaparraDépartement d'Innovation Thérapeutique et des Essais Précoces, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Alexandre T J MariaDepartment of Internal Medicine: Multi-Organic Diseases, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, 34295, France.
Agathe MasseauDepartment of Internal Medicine, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, 44000 France.
Stéphanie DehetteDepartment of Pneumology, Centre Hospitalier de Compiègne, 70200 Compiègne, France.
Amélie DeleporteDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, 1000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6694-0116
Andoni Echaniz-LagunaNeurology Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Saclay, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94270, France.
Christian DenierNeurology Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Saclay, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94270, France.
David AdamsNeurology Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Saclay, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94270, France.
Olivier LambotteDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Saclay, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94270, France.
Nicolas NoelDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Saclay, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94270, France.
Cécile CauquilNeurology Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Saclay, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94270, France.
Université Paris-Saclay · FRInserm · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Compiègne-Noyon · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRInstitut Jules Bordet · BEUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurological immune-related adverse events are complications of programmed-cell death 1 or programmed-cell death 1 ligand immunotherapies that can be life threatening and often lead to anticancer immunotherapy withdrawal. Scant clinical data are available that integrate the clinical presentation, therapeutic management and long-term outcome. All consecutive adult patients treated by programmed-cell death 1 or programmed-cell death 1 ligand immunotherapies, given alone or in combination with other treatment, who experienced a neurological immune-related adverse event with a severity grade ≥2 in Paris Saclay-University hospitals were investigated from June 2014 to February 2019. The frequency of neurological immune-related adverse events was calculated from the prospective Registre des Effets Indésirables Sévères des Anticorps Monoclonaux Immunomodulateurs en Cancérologie cohort. Forty patients presenting with 51 distinct neurological immune-related adverse events were included. The prevalence of grade ≥2 neurological immune-related adverse events was estimated to be 1.22% in the Registre des Effets Indésirables Sévères des Anticorps Monoclonaux Immunomodulateurs en Cancérologie cohort. Among 40 patients with neurological immune-related adverse events, 65% received programmed-cell death 1 or programmed-cell death 1 ligand monotherapy and 35% received a combination of programmed-cell death 1 plus anti-CTLA4 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). Clinical neurological presentations were peripheral (48%), central (35%), or mixed (18%). The severity of neurological immune-related adverse events was grade 2 for 14 (35%) and ≥grade 3 for 26 patients (65%). The mortality rate related to neurological immune-related adverse events was 8%. Corticosteroid treatment led to neurological recovery in 74%. Long-term follow-up highlighted that 53% of patients experienced long-term neurological sequelae. Five patients were rechallenged by programmed-cell death 1 monotherapy without recurrence of their neurological immune-related adverse event(s). Neurological immune-related adverse events induced by programmed-cell death 1 or programmed-cell death 1 ligand are rare but are severe with a mortality rate of 8% and long-term sequelae for 53% of patients. Corticosteroids should be started when neurological immunological complications are identified to avoid long-term sequelae.

Indexed as

immune checkpoint inhibitorsimmune-related adverse eventsneurological toxicityparaneoplastic syndromerechallenge

Identifiers

PMID34651126
PMCPMC8505025
OpenAlexW3201663154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.