Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34651115›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2021

Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal, Node Positive Breast Cancer: Characteristics, Treatment and Oncological Outcomes: A Single Center's Experience.

Erika Barbieri, Damiano Gentile, Alberto Bottini, Andrea Sagona, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Agnese Losurdo, Bethania Fernandes, Corrado Tinterri

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Association ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erika BarbieriBreast Unit, Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4980-3985
Damiano GentileBreast Unit, Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8861-5223
Alberto BottiniBreast Unit, Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8621-3060
Andrea SagonaBreast Unit, Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4372-9921
Wolfgang GatzemeierBreast Unit, Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4026-0283
Agnese LosurdoMedical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5674-9350
Bethania FernandesDepartment of Pathology, Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4327-1586
Corrado TinterriBreast Unit, Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS) Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7272-3924
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITHumanitas University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNeo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (BC). In luminal-like BC, the decision to administer NAC remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment, and oncological outcomes of luminal-like, node positive, BC patients treated with NAC, and to identify independent predictive factors for treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll consecutive patients with luminal-like, node positive BC who underwent NAC were retrospectively reviewed. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no invasive or

resultsA total of 205 luminal-like, node positive BC patients underwent NAC. Overall, 34 (16.6%) patients showed pCR, 86 (42.0%) patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS), 119 (58.0%) patients underwent mastectomy, 130 (63.4%) patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) without prior sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and 75 (36.6%) patients underwent breast surgery plus SLNB. Pathologic CR to NAC (29.1% vs 7.6% if no pCR, odds ratio = 2.866, 95% confidence interval = 1.296-6.341, p = 0.009) was found to significantly increase the probability to receive BCS. There was no significant difference in terms of disease-free and overall survival between patients with luminal-like, node positive BC receiving BCS or mastectomy (p = 0.596, p = 0.134, respectively), and ALND or SLNB only (p = 0.661, p = 0.856, respectively).

conclusionLuminal-like, node positive BC presents low pCR rates after NAC. Pre-operative chemotherapy increases the rate of BCS. Pathologic CR has emerged as an independent predictive factor for BCS. In patients with axillary pCR, SLNB is an acceptable procedure not associated with worse oncological outcomes.

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast-conserving surgeryChemotherapydissectionlymph nodesmastectomy

Identifiers

PMID34651115
PMCPMC8496120
OpenAlexW3205679867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.