Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34651110›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2021

Effects of Primary Tumor Resection on Metastatic Breast Cancer Survival and the Predictive Power of Neutrophil: Lymphocyte Ratio on Prognosis.

Yaşar Çöpelci, Umut Rıza Gündüz, Bülent Dinç, Nurhan Haluk Belen, Şeyda Gündüz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Harnessing hematological ratios: prognostic insights for breast cancer management.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yaşar ÇöpelciDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1583-8266
Umut Rıza GündüzDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0450-7223
Bülent DinçDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1684-0445
Nurhan Haluk BelenDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9156-5888
Şeyda GündüzClinic of Medical Oncology, Memorial Antalya Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9311-8611
Antalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRAntalya IVF · TRErzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim was to investigate the effect of primary tumor resection (PTR) on survival in metastatic breast cancer patients and to assess the power of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) regarding the prediction of prognosis in this patient group. MATERIALS AND

methodsFemale patients diagnosed with and starting treatment for metastatic breast cancer from 2003 to 2016 in the general surgery and oncology clinics at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Pre-treatment NLR value and survival situations were evaluated.

resultsA total of 117 patients were enrolled. The disease-specific survival (DSS) of the patients was 41.4 months. When stratified into PTR and systemic treatment (ST) groups, there was no difference in the survival (p = 0.054); 43.5 months in the PTR group vs 30.7 months in the ST group. When hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative subgroups were analyzed, DSS was significantly longer (p = 0.02) in the PTR group (55.4 months) compared to the ST group (41.8 months). Finally, in patients with an NLR of <2.3, DSS was significantly longer (p = 0.03) in the PTR group (56.1 months) compared to the ST group (25.2 months).

conclusionThese results suggest that DSS can be increased with PTR in selected patients with a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer. NLR may be useful in selecting patients for appropraite treatment modality.

Indexed as

Metastatic breast cancerneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioprimary tumor resectionsurvival

Identifiers

PMID34651110
PMCPMC8496121
OpenAlexW3207513535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.