Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34651083›Full record

ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2021

Novel web application for self-assessment of distance visual acuity to support remote consultation: a real-world validation study in children.

Louise Allen, Arun James Thirunavukarasu, Simon Podgorski, Deborah Mullinger

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06076785 (Impact of ODYSight in the Management of patientS With imparairEd Visual acuitY), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06076785 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Impact of ODYSight in the Management of patientS With imparairEd Visual acuitY (ODYSSEY).

TypeobservationalSponsorTilak HealthcareRan2023 to 2024Enrolled300ConditionsImpaired Visual AcuityArmsOdySight
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Exploring Parental Views of Remote Vision Testing in Children.The British and Irish orthoptic journal · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Louise AllenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2175-8884
Arun James ThirunavukarasuSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-4768
Simon PodgorskiSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Deborah MullingerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe difficulty in accurately assessing distance visual acuity (VA) at home limits the usefulness of remote consultation in ophthalmology. A novel web application, DigiVis, enables automated VA self-assessment using standard digital devices. This study aims to compare its accuracy and reliability in children with clinical assessment by a healthcare professional. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Children aged 4-10 years were recruited from a paediatric ophthalmology service. Those with VA worse than +0.8 logMAR (Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) or with cognitive impairment were excluded. Bland-Altman statistics were used to analyse both the accuracy and repeatability of VA self-testing. User feedback was collected by questionnaire.

resultsThe left eyes of 89 children (median 7 years) were tested. VA self-testing showed a mean bias of 0.023 logMAR, with a limit of agreement (LOA) of ±0.195 logMAR and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.816. A second test was possible in 80 (90%) children. Test-retest comparison showed a mean bias of 0.010, with an LOA of ±0.179 logMAR, an ICC of 0.815 and a repeatability coefficient of 0.012. 96% of children rated the test as good or excellent, as did 99% of their parents.

conclusionDigital self-testing gave comparable distance VA assessments with clinical testing in children and was well accepted. Since DigiVis self-testing can be performed under direct supervision using medical video consultation software, it may be a useful tool to enable a proportion of paediatric eye clinic attendances to be moved online, reducing time off school and releasing face-to-face clinical capacity for those who need it.

Indexed as

remote consultationsoftware validationtelemedicinevisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID34651083
PMCPMC8487205
OpenAlexW3202976789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.