ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2021
A Guide to Basic Statistics for Educational Research.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing biostatistics education for medical students in Poland: factors influencing perception and educational recommendations.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Family medicine residents' knowledge and attitudes towards biostatistics, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022Article
- Applying Conceptual and Theoretical Frameworks to Health Professions Education Research: An Introductory Workshop.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Clinician-educators often need to produce scholarship for academic promotion. While some programs exist to help with faculty development skills, few provide adequate statistical training to help educators evaluate their work. Methods: From January 2020 through January 2021, faculty at three academic centers attended one of five in-person or virtual seminars with dedicated statistical training for medical education interventions. These 90-minute seminars included a 45-minute PowerPoint presentation of common statistical tests used for educational interventions followed by small breakout groups to help attendees work on additional practice examples. After each seminar, surveys were distributed in person or virtually to obtain feedback. Results: Forty-three faculty attended the five seminars, with a range of surgical and nonsurgical specialties represented. Of these attendees, 38 (88%) completed session evaluations. The majority of respondents ( Discussion: This intervention shows that dedicated training on biostatistics used in educational interventions can help clinician-educators improve self-rated confidence and knowledge in choosing statistical tests in educational scholarship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.