ReviewCureus2021
Is Prophylaxis the Only Way Out for Cytokine Release Syndrome Associated With Chimeric Antigen T-cell Therapy?
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endocan in Acute Leukemia: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is a new advancement in hematology and oncology with its use in treating many refractory malignancies. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is CAR-T's clinically hazardous side effect, ranging from mild to life-threatening events. It was one of the first side effects detected with CAR-T. We conducted a literature review using PubMed (MeSH) to study CRS incidence after the administration of CAR-T to reflect its clinical importance. Nine studies are mentioned, with a total of 1357 patients enrolled for different types of refractory/relapsed cancers, and an average incidence of CRS of 64% is being noted. We have also stated numerous studies which mentioned the use and effectiveness of the commonly used drugs like tocilizumab, corticosteroids, and some new drugs. Although statistical data on CRS's conservative and supportive management is not available, the role of different supportive measures is evident. An overview of how it sets the framework of a peri-management approach has been considered. Through heightened incidence and relatively complex management of CRS, we would like to raise the question of the need for early prophylaxis against CRS when considering CAR-T. The need for more clinical trials in the future to prove the effectiveness of the latter is stated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.