Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34650817›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2021

Corneal and Epithelial Thickness Mapping: Comparison of Swept-Source- and Spectral-Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography.

Cristina Georgeon, Ilanite Marciano, Roxane Cuyaubère, Otman Sandali, Nacim Bouheraoua, Vincent Borderie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pachymetric Thresholds for Keratoconus Progression Based on MS-39 Measurement Precision.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cristina GeorgeonGRC 32,Transplantation et Thérapies Innovantes de La Cornée, Sorbonne Université, Centre Hospitalier National D'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8649-1442
Ilanite MarcianoGRC 32,Transplantation et Thérapies Innovantes de La Cornée, Sorbonne Université, Centre Hospitalier National D'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France.
Roxane CuyaubèreGRC 32,Transplantation et Thérapies Innovantes de La Cornée, Sorbonne Université, Centre Hospitalier National D'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France.
Otman SandaliGRC 32,Transplantation et Thérapies Innovantes de La Cornée, Sorbonne Université, Centre Hospitalier National D'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9133-5786
Nacim BouheraouaGRC 32,Transplantation et Thérapies Innovantes de La Cornée, Sorbonne Université, Centre Hospitalier National D'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7505-7798
Vincent BorderieGRC 32,Transplantation et Thérapies Innovantes de La Cornée, Sorbonne Université, Centre Hospitalier National D'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1395-8483
Centre hospitalier national d'ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the results and repeatability of the corneal thickness (CT) and epithelial thickness (ET) maps provided by Swept-Source-Optical Coherence Tomography with those of Spectral-Domain-OCT in normal eyes.

methods30 normal eyes of 30 patients were assessed by 3 trained operators with SS-OCT and SD-OCT.

resultsThe central and minimum ET obtained with both devices were correlated: central ET,

conclusionSS-OCT and SD-OCT provide reproducible measurements of CT and ET in normal corneas with a strong correlation between both technologies. However, both technologies are not interchangeable when the main thickness parameters (i.e., central and minimum CT and minimum ET) are used for diagnosing early keratoconus or calculating the expected residual stromal bed thickness before corneal refractive surgery or anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Identifiers

PMID34650817
PMCPMC8510821
OpenAlexW3203998550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.