ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Nursing effect of Nasoscopically assisted nasogastri tube and nasojejunal tube placement.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nasojejunal tube, jejunostomy tube, and fine needle catheter jejunostomy effects after esophagectomy.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Efficacy of short-chain polypeptide-based EEN formulas in alleviating intestinal injury in children with Crohn's disease: a single-center study in China.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the nursing effect of nasoscopically assisted nasogastri tube and nasojejunal tube placement.
methods94 patients who need to place nasogastric tube and nasojejunal tube to establish enteral nutrition were randomly divided into two groups: the observation group (n=49) and control group (n=45). The patients in the observation group received nasogastric tube placement and jejunal nutrition tube placement, and the patients in the control group received general gastroscope and placed gastric tube and jejunal nutrition tube through mouth. Success rate of catheterization, catheter pain score, satisfaction score, vital signs, completion time of catheterization, and complication were collected.
resultsthe fluctuation of vital signs in control group was significantly higher than that in observation group. There was statistical significance between two groups in vital signs after intervention (P<0.05), mainly manifested in the heart rate, breathing and pulse pressure difference. On the other hand, there was no statistical significance between two groups in pulse oxygen after nursing intervention (P>0.05). The catheter pain score is obviously improved in the observation group compared with control group after intervention. The improvement score of satisfaction in the observation group was 91.47±7.65 points, and that in the control group was 83.64±5.24 points. The completion time of catheterization was improved in the observation group compared with control group. There was statistical significance between two groups in satisfaction score and completion time of catheterization (P<0.05). The rate of abdominal distention and diarrhea in the control group was higher than that in the observation group (P<0.05).
conclusionNasoscopically assisted nasogastri tube and nasojejunal tube placement has the advantages of simple and fast, short operation time, high success rate and few complications. It is the first choice of intubation method for enteral nutrition support treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34650752PMC8507015W3207477635What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.