ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Effects of targeted community healthcare on the prevention of thrombotic adverse events in patients with coronary heart disease under the guidance of behavior change theory.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial of an Integrated Healthcare Model for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the effects of targeted community healthcare on the prevention of thrombotic adverse events in patients with coronary heart disease under the guidance of behavior change theory.
methodsA total of 89 patients with coronary heart disease who were admitted to our hospital were selected prospectively as subjects and divided into a research group (n=45, receiving targeted community healthcare under the guidance of behavior change theory) and a control group (n=44, receiving regular community healthcare) using a random number table method. The treatment period was 6 months. Then, patient's knowledge and attitude towards coronary heart disease as well as their personal habits, glucose and lipid metabolism indicators, compliance behaviors, quality of life and the incidence of thrombotic adverse events after 1-year of follow-up were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe scores of patient's knowledge, attitude and personal habits, compliance behaviors and quality of life were all higher in the research group than those in the control group after intervention (all P<0.05); and the glucose and lipid metabolism indicators including fasting insulin (INS), insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), total cholesterol (TC), triacylglycerol (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in the research group were significantly better than those in the control group after intervention (all P<0.05); after follow-up for 1 year, the total incidence of cerebral infarction, systemic embolism and myocardial infarction was significantly lower in the research group (6.67%) than that in the control group (25.00%) (P<0.05).
conclusionTargeted community healthcare under the guidance of the behavior change theory can effectively improve patient's compliance behaviors, change their knowledge, attitudes as well as their personal habits, keep their glucose and lipid metabolism indicators under control and reduce the risks of cardiovascular disease. Therefore, it is worth being applied in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34650745PMC8507073W3206171730What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.