ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Efficacy of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis combined with hemodialysis versus single hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interleukin-6 levels can be used to estimate cardiovascular and all-cause mortality risk in dialysis patients: A meta-analysis and a systematic review.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2023Pooled it
- Survival of Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Increases in the Early Years of Dialysis: Comparison of Parametric Frailty Survival Models.Advanced biomedical research · 2025Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients End-Stage Kidney Disease with Hypertension: Hemodialysis Vs Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Using EQ-5D-5L at a Tertiary Center in Indonesia.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to compare the efficacy of single hemodialysis (HD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) combined with HD in the treatment of end-stage renal disease.
methodsSeventy patients with end-stage renal disease in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 were included and divided into 35 patients in the single group (SG) and 35 patients in the combination group (CG) according to a random number table. The SG received HD treatment and the CG received CAPD combined with HD treatment.
resultsHemoglobin and serum albumin levels were higher, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine (Scr) levels were lower, and interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) levels were lower in the CG than in SG at the end of treatment (
conclusionCAPD combined with HD can improve renal function and nutritional levels more significantly, control inflammatory responses more effectively, and reduce complications compared to single HD treatment in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34650718PMC8507083W3205672509What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.